Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Nicole Gilbert
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Natalie Nicole Gilbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was PRODed and derPRODED some time back. I have done a fresh search for reliable sources but I can't find any Ghits that go beyond blogs, listings, YouTube, and download sites. Fails WP:Musicbio. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:57, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The subject does not pass the general notability guideline as the only sources I was able to find are just slight mentions in otherwise unrelated articles. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 17:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What about the very extensive article in Echelon Magazine cited? Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 18:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete The source cited by Candleabracadabra is probably up to GNG standards, but if we can't find anything else like it, that's a red flag. --BDD (talk) 23:40, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.