Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N-Rimes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

N-Rimes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All references are from Youtube, Twitter, social networking sites. Action Hero Shoot! 06:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note - creator Rimes Management (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) appears to have a conflict of interest here. clpo13_(talk) 06:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:ARTIST, I don't see any reliable, independent, in-depth coverage for GNG either. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:44, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:Unreliable references. Action Hero Shoot! 05:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per reasons stated by Piotrus and Action Hero. I note that there are two reliable sources in the article, but neither one speaks to the notability of the subject. Instead, they both relate to the death of the subject's aunt (for which I extend my condolences to the subject). NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:51, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:51, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as although I found results here, there's nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 05:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.