Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My WINGS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:58, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My WINGS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article, while perfectly formatted, referenced, etc. is based on an "airline" which will consist of 1 (one) aircraft. Hardly notable by anyone's standards... Same (similar?) article was previously speedy deleted. Technopat (talk) 19:57, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was tempted to speedy it, 'perfectly .. referenced', hmm, no. One weak reference, one blog, and the rest is primary. Not notable enough, I guess. Delete. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 20:29, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per the above. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. —Jujutacular ^T · C 21:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Discount airline with 1 airplane fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. SnottyWong ^confabulate 21:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep It is a mildly notable airline IJA (talk) 22:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Mildly notable as per references mentioned above? --Technopat (talk) 19:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. (Disclosure. Earlier this month, and based on the previous speedy delete here, I requested a speedy delete for the equivalent article at the Wikipedia in Spanish. Article was deleted.)--Technopat (talk) 19:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Two (blog) articles noting that a startup has begun does not constitute the kind of significant coverage we need. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 09:29, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This company doesn't meet WP:CORP for notability. A search gives very little back regarding WP:RS. Transmissionelement (talk) 15:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.