Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montreal River Hill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Bearcat (talk) 16:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Montreal River Hill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Completely unsourced article about a hill that exists. No claim of notability for any discernible reason: it just exists, the end. But a hill needs to be reliably sourceable as notable for something before an article becomes appropriate -- topics are not automatically eligible for inclusion in Wikipedia just because they exist. Bearcat (talk) 23:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. After putting some deeper research into this, this actually is salvageable with a stronger claim of notability and better referencing for it than is apparent from the current version. Bearcat (talk) 16:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.