Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mediapoint

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 02:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mediapoint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage to meet WP:CORP. Orphan article. Many of the sources listed (and not cited inline) are dead. LibStar (talk) 00:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: All sources are listed are dead. It's an orphan article and I agreed with LibStar. CastJared (talk) 00:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  archives exist for all of the links so the fact they are dead is not relevant Jack4576 (talk) 11:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Sorry, I think I suggest that it will keep. CastJared (talk) 12:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'll reverse to delete. CastJared (talk) 04:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, and Australia. Skynxnex (talk) 02:43, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Archives of the links demonstrate this org had SIGCOV in 2009. Notability is not temporary Jack4576 (talk) 11:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Jack4576: Although I appreciate the sources that you've added, I would say that it still fails WP:SIGCOV because both are largely comprised of interviews. You mention "SIGCOV from 2009", however both of the sources you added were from 2012. Do you have any 2009 sources that could be added to the article? JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 06:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  If you click and open the archived link. “Brothers Persist as downturn bites advertisers” you can see the article date as 2 Aug 2009 Jack4576 (talk) 06:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:50, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Still fails WP:GNG, and per my earlier comment the sources added fail WP:SIGCOV. Jack hasn't added any more sources and is now banned from AfD, so I don't think much is going to be done here. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:38, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.