Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maplehurst Correctional Centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JForget 00:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maplehurst Correctional Centre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks like nothing more than a PR blurb from a prison that isn't particularly notable. Irbisgreif (talk) 20:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy Delete~~ as copyvio of [1]. TOS reserving copyright is here: [2]. Page tagged accordingly. Arakunem^Talk 20:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional free-content material added, so no longer Speedyable. RM'ed copvio material from the page. I'll wait to see if/how it is further expanded before !voting, as the article is only a few minutes old... Arakunem^Talk 20:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Still a certain promotional tone, if a prison can be said to be promoted, but I have found independent sources (though much is devoted to the Toronto 18). May also be notable for a new approach to prisons in Canada: [3], if editors want to tackle that angle as well. Original article was a PR blurb, as nom correctly noted, and in fact was a copyvio as I noted. That has been resolved now, and I think we have a viable article. Arakunem^Talk 18:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. May be largest prison in Canada according to union in 2006. Canuckle (talk) 07:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC) Flagship modern prison that serves as model for transformation of Ontario's corrections system -- See here. Important part of public infrastructure. Home to high-profile inmates such as terrorism suspects, the Toronto 18... Should be moved to official facility name - Maplehurst Correctional Complex Canuckle (talk) 08:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If it is kept, that's a good move. Irbisgreif (talk) 13:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Canuckle (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.