Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MTI Home Video
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. closing properly - was withdrawn by nominator Spartaz Humbug! 17:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Close - withdrawn by nominator with no objections
- MTI Home Video (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Having a part in producing many films means that a company is likely notable, but this company only releases films to DVD. I found no significant coverage. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Significant coverage in Miami Herald Home Media Magazine - a news search brings up other hits on the company. I don't think this is anything to do with Music Theatre International. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn: Well, I'm fine with those two references. This can be closed. SL93 (talk) 14:05, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.