Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of state Constitution Parties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Constitution Party (United States)#Affiliated organizations. (non-admin closure) SST flyer at 08:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of state Constitution Parties

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Every single one of the links in this article redirect back to the main Constitution Party (United States) article. This article has been useless since the articles of the individual state chapters of the U.S. CP were deleted. 1990'sguy (talk) 23:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Per nom's well articulated reasons. Pointless to have a list where all the items in the list point to the same article. Fieari (talk) 07:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy redirect to Constitution Party (United States)#Affiliated organizations, where the list is already contained and with much more information about these state parties. This could have (and per policy at WP:ATD should have) been done prior to resorting to AFD. Note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constitution Party of Alabama for the history of why these are all redirects. postdlf (talk) 15:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. but do not redirect. I don't see the point of it. The redirects from the state parties might as well go directly to the main article. DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @DGG: It's a plausible search term, so it should redirect to that section. The state affiliates do redirect to that section for the most part, and this should too. Why are you against a redirect? Smartyllama (talk) 19:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Postdlf. Most of the state affiliates redirect to that section, and this is a plausible search term for someone looking for the information contained in that section. There's really no reason not to do it, and Redirects are cheap. Smartyllama (talk) 19:00, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.