Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Digimon Frontier characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Digimon Frontier characters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is made up of only plot summaries. I don't see any real world information that sufficiently establishes notability. Fangusu (talk) 18:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep No real reason presented for deletion or effort to fix the article issues, and nominator has an SPI against them currently. Nate • (chatter) 21:19, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Duplicates Digimon Frontier#Characters in large part. The list right now is unreferenced WP:OR might be best for a WP:BLOWUP. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrschimpf: Please stop talking about my Sockpuppet Investigation. I am sorry about that misconduct. I don't think it is relevant to this AfD and, for another thing, I am not an evil person. Fangusu (talk) 02:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 03:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete With one unreliable source I would call this list unreferenced and it contains lots of original research such as you would find in a fan based Wikia, which is why those exist in the first place. —Kirt^Message 11:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom and KirtZJ. Seems to be pure WP:FANCRUFT. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.