Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Junho
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:13, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Lee Junho (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Singer of limited notability outside his group, 2PM. Tried redirecting to band page but was constantly reverted, so bringing here for resolution. Google search on "Lee Junho" -"2PM" shows a lot of unreliable fansites and social media, but no significant coverage from independent reliable sources. Google news search shows no results. MikeWazowski (talk) 04:16, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Google search on a celebrity is never wise. The popularity of 2PM is so widespread that you will only encounter various fansites and miscellaneous social media. (This could apply to other 2PM member Chansung who has not even been considered for deletion.) Try Google News for legitimate news on a celebrity instead of Google search. But using simply "Junho" would be better. His fans know him as "Junho" not "Lee Junho." I found a handful of sites searching "2PM Junho" on Google News. Another reason for lack of news may be that notable news can only be found in Korean. 2PM's success is mainly in Korea, and therefore a large amount of press cannot be expected on a member of foreign boy band. Nevertheless, he has become famous to K-Pop loving Americans as well as fans in other countries. His article in Wikipedia exists in five different languages (including the english one). Although user MikeWazowski is not convinced that he is notable, the sheer amount of fan pages that can be found should be proof enough that he is deserving of an article in Wikipedia. -SharonT (talk) 05:30, 29 November 2011 (UTC)— Pinkmango00 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Actually Naver is the primary search engine in Korea. Do a search using "2PM 준호" at Naver for reliable news. N8hobbs (talk) 06:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)— N8hobbs (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 07:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 07:01, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 18:51, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep he seems to pass minimum notablity issues. The references are not required to be in English.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:50, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per SharonT and John Peck Lambert above. Mikepellerin (talk) 01:59, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per SharonT and John Peck Lambert and Mikepellerin above.--Lpmfx (talk) 02:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- 'note to closing admin No opinion on this AFD myself, but there is a further keep vote on the talkpage. ϢereSpielChequers 12:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.