Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent Street (Simcoe, Ontario)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Simcoe, Ontario. MBisanz ^talk 01:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kent Street (Simcoe, Ontario)

No sign of any notability AndrewHowse (talk) 01:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete very close to a G11 as spam, but better to discuss it. DGG (talk) 06:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm usually kind to streets, but I don't see anything distinctive about this one. No historic value and not an important route. It looks like an add for a development. --Oakshade (talk) 06:38, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge anythign worthwhile to Simcoe, Ontario and then Delete. I do not think we normally need articles on streets, only on very special ones. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think this information should also be merged into the Simcoe, Ontario article. However, I difer from Peterkingiron because this article should also be redirected instead of deleted. Articles about individual streets should redirect to the respective town article no matter what. GVnayR (talk) 18:43, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Simcoe, Ontario. Per my own personally devised policy and experience with minor details in small communities, the first choice should be to merge a landmark into the most local place. We did this for a traffic circle earlier. --Triadian (talk) 21:18, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

unfortunately, most of the material is a spammy list of businesses, and I don;t see how that is usable anywhere at all. DGG (talk) 03:05, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just made the article less spammy. Now I hope it's suitable enough to be merged and redirected. After all, Triadian had the right idea about merging a traffic circle into the most local article. GVnayR (talk)

Delete nn street. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.