Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Mead

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to List of Degrassi characters. Merge rather than redirect so the list can be structured à la List of Degrassi: The Next Generation characters. czar  15:09, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kathleen Mead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable character and article has IMDB references with tons of plot detail. Does not meet GNG. Also per recent AfDs for similar characters in the series: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tessa Campanelli, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly J. Sinclair, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Stone (Degrassi character), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Cameron all which were closed as delete/redirect. Gloss 18:23, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and clean up. The fact that the article needs improvement is not a criteria for deletion. Tchaliburton (talk) 06:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


But the fact that it doesn't properly demonstrate or source any notability in the first place is a criterion for deletion. Bearcat (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:09, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 07:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.