Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider Blade: Missing Ace (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 00:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kamen Rider Blade: Missing Ace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A previous AfD for this article closed in September of last year without consensus. The closing administrator wished to provide editors with the opportunity to find Japanese or hardcopy sources and recommended that the article be revisited "in a month or two." It has been ten months since the AfD closed and no new sources have been added to the article. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for films. Neelix (talk) 16:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I searched high and wide on imdb.com for this movie: but it is not documented there. If it aint in IMDB, it shouldnt have its own WP article. IMDB does show the underlying Kamen Rider Blade TV show, but not a "feature length movie" as this article claims. If such a movie exists (and there is a chance it does exist, based on some google hits) it can be described in the main Kamen Rider Blade article, but it does not merit its own article. --Noleander (talk) 01:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Since it's a theatrical movie, it is surely notable. It's just that it's 7 years old, so any news about its release are hard to find. Moscowconnection (talk) 16:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a professional review: [1] Moscowconnection (talk) 17:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominator - The statement that this film was theatrically released is not sourced. Furthermore, a film's notability is not demonstrated by whether or not it was released in theatres; its notability is demonstrated by reliable sources. Ten months after an AfD should be quite a sufficient amount of time to find significant coverage of the topic in reliable secondary sources if such coverage does in fact exist. That the film is seven years old should make sources easier to find, not harder; the more time has passed, the more sources are likelier to have been written and the likelier it is that those sources will be inserted into journal article databases and the like. Neelix (talk) 14:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, if it's a movie for elementary school kids. The movie was in the news back then, it's obvious. Moscowconnection (talk) 00:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here it is, the Director's Cut was 13th on Oricon: MISSING ACE Director's Cut Moscowconnection (talk) 00:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An entry on a single list does not constitute significant coverage. Neelix (talk) 12:21, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.