Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Yguado (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Jam City (company). Daniel (talk) 04:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Yguado (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources used as references are either rewrites of press releases, profile listings, or tangential to the subject. I am of the opinion that this article does not pass WP:GNG. This article was also WP:BLAR-ed for a similar reasoning but subsequently reverted. – robertsky (talk) 16:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Jam City (company) - Doesn't pass WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. The news story about him being named CEO seems to be the only significant thing written about him. The sources added by User:VertyBerty are not significant coverage in my opinion. --Mika1h (talk) 11:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mild keep te subject's role as co-founder and CEO of Jam City, as well as an investor in Cloud9, establishes his significance in the tech and gaming industries. The depth of coverage in existing sources has been questioned; however, the criteria for notability require significant coverage, which reflects his impact, not exhaustive coverage. The potential for the article to be expanded with additional information over time, as the industries evolve, makes me think that this is the reason why there is no consensus for the page's removal. NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 13:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep leaning towards keep due to the businessman's founding experience with Jam City and Cloud9, coupled with the minimal yet non-trivial media coverage. --BoraVoro (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, noting that this is a stub article which I believe sets the bar for SIGCOV lower than if it was on its way to being featured article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Jam City. Marginally notable at best. Possible COI issues.
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 05:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A. B., Jam City or Jam City (company)? Cabayi (talk) 10:43, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ Cabayi: thanks for asking. Jam City (company)
—-A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 16:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Jam City. I don't think the sources demonstrate significant coverage here; aside from the source directly about his connection to Jam City, most of the citations are not about him directly (the Forbes article, for example, is about ex-MySpace executive DeWolfe, and Yguado is mentioned in a sentence of context for a quote he offered.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 21:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
David Fuchs, Jam City or Jam City (company)? Cabayi (talk) 10:43, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Jam City (company), sorry for not disambiguating. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 15:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.