Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Gayle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mention in a few random websites don't really make for notability. Overwhelming consensus is to delete. - Ta bu shi da yu 14:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Gayle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No evidence of notability per WP:PORNBIO. Tabercil 16:39, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 16:40, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No coverage in WP:RS and no notability. Valrith 16:44, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Weak keep Possible significant coverage here and here. Epbr123 18:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Conditional Keep. Conditional on the fact that I don't read Italian very well. :-) But the first link Epbr123 points to http://aziende.economia.alice.it/racconti/r120_jessicagayle.html , looks like non-trivial coverage, 3 pages, by a web site which is not just a porn fan site. The second one is shorter (half of the last page), but http://www.dramma.it looks like a general acting site, again not just a porn fan site. http://www.dapaura.com/rete/imgv9/gayle/jessica_gayle.html is another short interview, and this one looks like it is a porn fan site, but it's been reprinted at http://www.planetmediagroup.it/public/news.asp?id=7 and these things are adding up to meeting Wikipedia:Notability. So keep, unless someone more knowledgeable with the Italian web shows up and says that these are all a lot more trivial than they look. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 16:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per nom. Non-notable.Watchingthevitalsigns 12:52, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NN--Tiptopper 00:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep due to references provided above. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 00:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.