Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Emmett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Emmett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mccapra tagged this for notability a couple of months ago. I think it's a borderline failure of WP:CREATIVE, the only independent, significant coverage (that I can access, a couple of the links are broken) is a local story about her wedding. However, as I say, it's borderline, so I'm erring on the side of caution and AFDing. SITH (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
a thought: since the two articles are both about her film it's BLP1E as well. The second item is good but very short. The coverage is very sparse.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.