Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Ibrao
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- James Ibrao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced BLP, makes a number of claims. DeProdded by IP with edit summary "kung fu master is notable" Well, yes, I agree that it's not an A7, but it needs to be sourced or deleted. Jclemens (talk) 07:07, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —jmcw (talk) 11:42, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Ed_Parker. There is a reference in the Parker article that he was a student of Parker. jmcw (talk) 11:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article gives no reason why he's notable and I couldn't find one based on independent sources. Being a student of Ed Parker (or anyone else) doesn't make him notable since notability is not inherited. He's widely mentioned, but the sources don't seem to be independent. Astudent0 (talk) 14:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable unless someone gives some independent sources. I have to agree with Astudent0. Papaursa (talk) 16:26, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.