Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacbern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to The June Junes. Daniel (talk) 07:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jacbern

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 17:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, Music, and Mexico. PepperBeast (talk) 17:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 19:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, California, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to The June Junes. See Mizell Brothers for a comparison. Mach61 (talk) 21:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to The June Junes, as above. Seems like a credible WP:ATD "at this time", although I can't say I am too sure about the long term viability of the target article either. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.