Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Cavallari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Cavallari

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was deprodded by the creator with the comment "If the artistic director of the Wa Ballet is not a notable then nobody is. Certainly the article can be improved by not notable???-who decides these things". Well, WA Ballet doesn't look that notable, either: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Australian Ballet. As for notability, since User:Brother_Gilbert asked: community decides on this by creating and maintaining pages like Wikipedia:Notability in general, and debates on particular cases in place like this very discussion in particular. So, let the discussion start - so far the article looks to me like failing Wikipedia:Notability with no claim of notability and poor sourcing. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No apparent attempt to even look for sources in the nomination statement. Searching for "Ivan Cavallari" in the West Australian newspaper's website produces lots of useful references: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] - there should also be more available in archives given that News Corp has moved to a paywall model. I imagine that Limelight magazine has also published articles on him. Articles on WA Ballet productions in the Fairfax media also typically note Cavallari's role, which would be useful for fleshing out coverage of his career in WA (as examples, [6], [7], [8]. Nick-D (talk) 23:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:03, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Appears to have received some regional coverage for his work. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:45, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Nick-D, coverage in multiple independent sources is enough to satisfy WP:GNG. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.