Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inky Gibbens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inky Gibbens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet criteria of WP:GNG or WP:BIO. The articles cited are about the webpage, not about her in particular. Google search for "Inky Gibbens" results in fewer than 100 results, with a lot of them being sketchy sites that link to her TEDx talk. ... discospinster _talk 19:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 19:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 19:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete does not meet any notability criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:42, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:42, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - After doing a BEFORE, subject of article clearly meets WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Signigicant coverage in verifiable reliable secondary sources feature her in articles, for example: WIRED [1], The Economist[2],Smithsonian[3],The Times[4],RedBull[5],U of Cambridge[6],Geographical Magazine, the Magazine of the Royal Geographical Society[7],The Australian [8], and others. The article needs to be improved to reflect these sources, but should not be deleted. Netherzone (talk) 13:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Those articles are about the software, not about her. ... discospinster _talk 21:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Netherzone. There is enough significant coverage from reliable sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. - Whisperjanes (talk) 20:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The sources Netherzone provides are about Tribalingual and constitute insignificant coverage of Gibbens (many of them also don't count for notability for other reasons, such as the fact that they're non-independent interviews without additional editorial content). Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:44, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Of the sources mentioned by Netherzone: #1 is primarily about the company not about Inky, #2 does not even mention Inky, #3 is an interview (generally considered a primary source for the purpose of notability), #5 is an interview with Red Bull so come on, #6 is a primary source - "Tribalingual graduated from Cambridge Social Ventures in June 2017", #7 is primarily about the company with quotes from Inky (ie basically an interview sans independent content about her). #4 and #8 I can't access at work so no comment on those. But from what I can access, I'm not impressed. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.