Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inbound marketing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 03:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inbound marketing

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

pure jargon, non-encyclopedic; the relevant encyclopedic aspects are covered in multiple articles DGG ( talk ) 06:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree 100%, this article is rubbish and it's content is far too minimal to warrant an article. Definitely should go Chariotsacha (talk) 04:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article needs cleaned up, and more references but the google book search finds multiple hits that use this subject as all or part of their title in the same way it is used in this article Inbound Marketing and SEO & Inbound Marketing Book & Inbound Marketing For Dummies Jeepday (talk) 19:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is WP:ITEXISTS. It's definitely a term; it's probably not a relevant one. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - we never published original research, and we avoid articles on neologisms. Bearian (talk) 22:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Escapee (talk) 06:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete as unencyclopedic and per Bearian. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if there is an encyclopedic topic buried under all that verbiage, WP:TNT. XOR'easter (talk) 17:30, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Digital marketing. The sourcing doesn't seem to support even a stub article, but a redirect seems appropriate based on what links to it. We should also take a look at Inbound marketing automation if this one isn't notable. Redoryxx (talk) 04:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.