Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hits 93 Toronto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hits 93 Toronto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorial article about an internet radio stream, referenced almost entirely to its own self-published content about itself rather than to reliable source coverage -- even the few sources that are independent of it are still blogs or user-generated discussion forums, not real notability-supporting media. As always, every internet radio stream that exists at all does not get an automatic free pass over WP:NMEDIA just because its own self-published web presence technically verifies that it exists -- it would have to clear WP:GNG on the basis of reliable source coverage in media for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It ain't a radio station broadcasting anything over an FM station, and this entire article reads like fanfiction that even the most fervent radio fan wouldn't care about from a real licensed radio station. Nate • (chatter) 20:34, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, but with a comment that this article is better written than a good number of licensed AM/FM radio station articles on Wikipedia. Much of it is purely promotional, yes, but it's informative. Strikerforce^Talk 22:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.