Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hacksurance
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete under A7. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 13:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hacksurance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. Sources say nothing about Hacksurance as a company, they're just three copies of the same two-minute CNBC piece about cyberattack insurance that happens to use the word "hacksurance" in their headline. McGeddon (talk) 09:21, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete: As per nominator and failure of WP:GNG. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 13:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 03:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 03:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.