Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Barlow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Carlton Football Club players. as an ATD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Barlow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC and WP:SIGCOV. A player who only played in a single game is not notable, and does not have in-depth enough coverage to pass our notability guidelines. 4meter4 (talk) 15:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Has not been the subject of significant coverage; not suprising as records show only played one game. As suggested, fails WP:SPORTBASIC. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 22:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• A redirect to List of Carlton Football Club players is an obvious alternative to deletion. – Teratix ₵ 08:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The subject is not covered in the target. TarnishedPath^talk 09:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @TarnishedPath: You didn't read carefully enough, control+F "Fred Barlow". – Teratix ₵ 01:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Sorry, that was unnecessarily personal. But he is there, in the 1890s section. – Teratix ₵ 02:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  My apologies. I did a ctrl-F when I made the last comment and couldn't find it. I must have had a typo in my search term. TarnishedPath^talk 04:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails WP:NSPORT, couldn't find anything online either. GMH Melbourne (talk) 01:55, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable sources which are independent from the subject. TarnishedPath^talk 09:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.