Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freacher
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:01, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Freacher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable neologism. I could find no RS usage of this term, let alone significant coverage. ThaddeusB (talk) 00:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. Eddie.willers (talk) 01:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:14, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This neologism belongs on Urban Dictionary. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:26, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 11:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.