Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erin Harkes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I see a consensus to Keep this article but also a criticism of newly added sources, that they are not independent. Please continue to work to improve this article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Erin Harkes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some sources and successes, but not enough to pass WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Boleyn (talk) 21:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, New Jersey, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:18, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree. Doesn’t meet GNG guidelines and thus should be deleted. Go4thProsper (talk) 00:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Go4thProsper Please check the new citations I have posted below and reconsider your vote. Royal88888 (talk) 03:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I withdraw my “Delete” vote. I am neutral to this AfD post. Go4thProsper (talk) 22:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Nominator has not done a good job at BEFORE. Just found a whole bunch of news articles about her and have updated the article. Check 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Royal88888 (talk) 03:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep refs provided satisfy GNG. Djflem (talk) 10:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weakest of IAR Keeps: I can't find more than passing qualitative coverage of her music or comedy -- and that includes the additions by Royal88888 none of which fully meet WP:INDEPENDENT. National attention (Fallon) is clearly not sufficient. Her best-established claim for notability is against WP:MUSICBIO#7 for winning multiple local newspaper polls for best local singer-songwriter, but that still requires sufficient independent coverage of her. What tips me over the line for MUSICBIO#7 is her hosting the 2019 Capital Region awards. But this is rather operating by sonar, and it would be nice if there were clear significant RS coverage of her work -- music and/or comedy -- that wasn't agglomerated with an interview or press release (noting that there may well be coverage that is not or is no longer offline). ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 09:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Additions by Royal88888 have clearly demonstrated notability. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.