Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erick Vega

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:05, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Erick Vega

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts/Article_Review Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts/Article_Review/15th April 2010, User:Jmcw37 as secretary.
WP:NRVE Wikipedia:WPMA/N "No reliable sources found to verify notability" jmcw (talk) 09:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —jmcw (talk) 09:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article consists solely of his boxing record and a description of his loss on The Contender. Unless all professional boxers are considered notable, I can find nothing to show this fighter passes WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 23:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete maybe merge into the article on the contender?--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:42, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A search for sources has not revealed anything strongly supporting notability. Janggeom (talk) 04:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find anything notable about this boxer. Astudent0 (talk) 14:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.