Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day Above Ground
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Day Above Ground (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Originally I propose a move request but I have decided to nominate this as I am uncertain this band or song meet notability criteria or have barely scraped it as the level of news coverage have been minor throughout the controversy, only lasting for one week by a small portion of news agencies, neither it have ever charted. Like I said on my move proposal, the song that caused the controversy eclipsed the band for notability since there is nothing to write about them so will only scrape for a WP:BLP1E and WP:BIO1E as they are nowhere in the level of Rebecca Black's Friday, therefore WP:NOTNEWS applies to them. Donnie Park (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A non-news story used to promote a non-notable band. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:49, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Lugnuts. No indication that this kerfuffle has any WP:LASTING relevance. --BDD (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete leaving the article here is just going to cause cito-genesis. The band would have to do something else to meet WP:GNG In ictu oculi (talk) 08:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.