Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Manic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW delete Jclemens (talk) 00:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Manic

This unsigned 15 year old DJ does not appear to meet any of the WP:MUSIC notability criteria. The article states that they are unsigned and their claim to fame is through social networking sites. No third-party reliable sources are provided and a general Google search ([1]) doesn't return anything other than the artist's own various websites while a search of Google Australia (the DJ's home country) ([2]) returns nothing. Note that the blue-linked items in the discography are to generic words, and not this DJ's releases. Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't have a recording contract (although this may be a less important indicator of notability in the future) and contains no independent reliable sources. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 08:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not evident as required by WP:MUSIC. WWGB (talk) 08:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pretty clearly fails WP:MUSIC, and I was not able to find any independent coverage of this person through Google, which one would expect if he were a currently active and notable electronic musician. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:42, 19 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Unambiguously fails WP:MUSIC, Myspace.com is not a reliable source. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 19:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Last.fm is not a reliable source either, as it accepts user-contributed content. Radiant chains (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Lacks substantial coverage. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.