Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Kelblizz
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DJ Kelblizz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO and WP:MUSICBIO. Little coverage in reliable secondary sources. The two "biography and net worth" sources are identical and appear to be user-submitted. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:11, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:50, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:50, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Wizkizayo has expressed the following concern in Special:Diff/901746041: "Please these article should not be deleted teahouse help me out here..the article has been improved and won't be edited without proper references" ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:37, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG. Editor WP:NOTHERE. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 04:49, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Fails WP:GNG. -- Begoon 04:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. It looks more like A7 to me. No notability whatsoever and likely autobiography. – Ammarpad (talk) 05:45, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notabilty. No independent sources. Maproom (talk) 06:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Honestly, what has this guy even done that's notable? Giving random local disc jockeys articles is a bit redundant. Foxnpichu (talk) 09:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Like TimTempleton and Begoon said, fails WP:GNG. User44654 (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the article please everyone should support these article, it is notible.Wizkizayo (talk) 23:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Save the article, Don't delete, other references has been added Wizkizayo (talk) 23:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Save - review the references or an admin should re-edit the article instead of delecting.Wizkizayo (talk) 13:55, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Wizkizayo: Repeating your plea isn't going to sway anyone's opinion. You need to show how and why the article should be retained.
- You said you've added references, but the sources you've linked to are not reliable. Blogs, press release sites and other self-published sources aren't reliable and can't establish this person's notability.
- Also saying that "an admin should re-edit the article" is shifting the responsibility onto others. The burden of evidence is on you, the contributor, to ensure that your content is verifiable from reliable sources. Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources has a list of sources that are considered reliable (and unreliable) for music-related topics.
- Finally, Wikipedia does not accept articles on up-and-coming people or things. Someone or something must be already notable to be considered worthy of inclusion. Possible future fame has no effect on present notability. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:04, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Use of the phrase "fast rising" indicates this is a case of WP:TOOSOON.--Auric talk 11:50, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. A Google search of him doesn't show anything convincing. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 14:13, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom- Fails notability, the sources aren't reliable and can't provide this person's notability. --MA Javadi (talk) 18:12, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the article has a reliable source ,the biography and net worth on he's Google search tells more about the subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by Famouspeople18 (talk • contribs) 14:10, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Famouspeople18: I changed the • sign you had here to a *. It's for formatting. Also remember that when participating in these types of discussions remember to put your view in bold. (To do this put the text you want bold surrounded with '''. Like this '''bold''') See WP:DISCUSSAFD for more info. Thanks! OkayKenG (talk) 00:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.