Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CustoMess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 22:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CustoMess

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found zero significant coverage for this software. The creator of the software started the article. SL93 (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I didn't find any notable third-party mentions on this company on search engines, nothing on Google News. SwisterTwister talk 04:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: article was erroneously speedy-deleted as a copyvio. Restored because the presumed source is clearly a Wikipedia reprint; AfD reopened. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Googling, the only thing I found was the book reprinting this WP article. Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION. Msnicki (talk) 16:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; does not appear to be notable. bobrayner (talk) 19:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.