Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Composr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Composr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a CMS. Fails WP:GNG for lack of independent reliable sources. - Mr X 14:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 15:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. CMS Matrix, the only ref not from the developers, asks developers to submit their own listings and has no written editorial policy. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 15:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clearly useful for potential users, having many valuable features. OlavN (talk) 12:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Usefulness is not an established criteria for keeping articles. The issue here is notability, WP:N, and the lack of reliable sources WP:RS.Dialectric (talk) 16:44, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no significant independent coverage, it fails WP:GNG. No claim to notability is made. --Bejnar (talk) 02:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication that this meets our notability requirements for products. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cannot find sources to meet WP:GNG. 22:22, 18 March 2016 (UTC) signed with too many tildas by Walter Görlitz.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.