Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chan Ka-kui

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chan Ka-kui (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Just 1 source supporting article and not much notable. Fails WP:GNG. Faf Du Plessis (talk) 07:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 4. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 07:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Excessive in-universe description without legacy outside of movie franchise. 野狼院ひさし _{Hisashi Yarouin} 02:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Very notable movie character played by Jackie Chan; I googled "警察故事督察陳家駒" (Police Story Inspector Chan Ka Kui) and got many secondary sources. STSC (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Non notable character. Howzat Utseya (talk) 05:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:JNN? Really? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I think (actually, pretty sure) this user is a sock of TekkenJinKazama (talk · contribs). They've tried to create various character articles in the past, usually of small characters (see this AFD of one Jin created with nothing to support the notability of the character. As a result, they've filed several AFD's on other character articles, some of which are deserved. Need to get the SPI filed on this one. Ravensfire (talk) 19:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Notable character and covered in multiple sources, English and Chinese. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep sourcing seems quite strong and supports notability of the character. Ravensfire (talk) 19:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.