Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedarview Middle School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cedarview Middle School

procedural nomination—version brought to AFD: This page has an interesting history - PROD-Redirect-RFD:keep-return to stub-PROD:seconded-AFD. The latest PROD nominator stated "Non-notable elementary school. Listing entry. There are at least 1,000,000 primary schools in the world." The article lost most of its content as a result of its conversion to redirect and back, as evidenced by the diff between the two PROD'd article states. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 06:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 06:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 06:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't think I saw the lengthier version. Had I seen it, I would have placed a merge-school tag instead. Now that we are here, let me just say that I don't think that having a "bright blue roof" or even holding a "world record for Largest Simultaneous Yo-yo" (unsourced) are enough for this school to have its own page. AnteaterZot (talk) 06:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think it fails to meet Wikipedia:Notability (schools). They did set a world record, but it's not a very widely known record and there's no references about it. Hatmatbbat10 (talk) 06:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep and Merge, The school is included in the template. Maybe it could be merged with another article -Rustam 07:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So what if it is included in the template. There are about 50 other redlink schools in there as well. Find an article to move it to and I might say merge, but at the moment, I say delete.Tavix (talk) 18:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per DoubleBlue. I have to say, it really is a great article now, so good work. Tavix (talk) 23:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I've expanded it. Verifiable and NPOV plus: in 2007 Guinness Book of World Records (p. 7 apparently), winner of 2004 national flag football championship and bronze medal at world championship, recognised in community for Walkathon for adults with multiple disabilities. DoubleBlue (Talk) 20:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - great work by User:DoubleBlue has provided the reliable, independent secondary sources needed to meet WP:N. TerriersFan (talk) 23:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, obviously. And great work, DoubleBlue! JERRY ^talk _contribs 00:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good job of referencing it and expanding it. Hatmatbbat10 (talk) 03:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or keep. CRGreathouse (t | c) 03:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - lots of sources have been added. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 19:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources provided by DoubleBlue, great work. RFerreira (talk) 06:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this is the home of a former 2004) flag football national champion team. Good references by DoubleBlue! --Patar knight (talk) 17:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.