Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Ethnic Cleansing Team (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian_Ethnic_Cleansing_Team

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. A group with 2 known members (ever) found liable under an administrative act (a fine payment) that has since been rescinded. Section 13 is no longer part of the Canadian Human Rights Act for over 3 years. There are no more active links or references. The only call to notability is a media source referring to the case as "landmark ruling" for issuing a small fine against non-entities. It's all Kinda of moot now. At this point this entire article is about a group who never did anything put post a single message online very shortly after 9/11 WikiErrorCorrection (talk) 13:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Clearly a WP:GNG and WP:WEB fail.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:33, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:GNG. Quis separabit? 18:45, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Moving stray vote from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3rd --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Delete Not notable. A group with 2 known members (ever) found liable under an administrative act (a fine payment) that has since been rescinded. Section 13 is no longer part of the Canadian Human Rights Act for over 3 years. There are no more active links or references. The only call to notability is a media source referring to the case as "landmark ruling" for issuing a small fine against non-entities. It's all Kinda of moot now. At this point this entire article is about a group who never did anything put post a single message online very shortly after 9/11 WikiErrorCorrection (talk) 02:35, 10 September 2016 (UTC)"[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.