Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombing Run (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:45, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bombing Run

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication whatsoever of notability; like Onslaught (gametype) and Assault (gametype), this is just one way of playing a not-very-notable computer game. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, and those other two articles should be deleted as well since there is no notability.Frmorrison (talk) 17:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, reads like a game instruction manual and thus would seem to be how to content. The paragraph in the game articles does the job well enough. Dolescum (talk) 07:11, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a Gameguide/"How-to" website. Fails the GNG too. Sergecross73 msg me 14:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've been watching this article for a while to see if the sources would eventually come: they have not. The term as used in a video game reliable sources search did not show it being used similarly, and the Unreal usage was just as prevalent as different multiplayer modes or air force-style "bombing runs". I could see this redirecting to the glossary but I'd need to see more sources first that even confirm that the Unreal usage is actually prevalent throughout the rest of the industry. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar ♔ 17:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.