Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Time Mansion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Big Time Rush episodes. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:40, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Big Time Mansion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Contested PROD. Including all unsourced episodes on List of Big Time Rush episodes. — Jeff G. ツ 23:57, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It turns out they're all unsourced, and the rest are listed below. :( — Jeff G. ツ 05:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The episodes do not need their own articles for any reason, they just re-iterate information on the episode list, with nothing more valuable added. CloversMallRat (talk) 16:09, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- sourceless plot summary. Zero useful content. Reyk _YO! 08:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Big Time Rush episodes. While I'm not a fan of the show, since I personally think of boybands as a plague on the music industry, these articles have more detail than the existing list. Considering the trend against articles on TV episodes, I'd rather see the details preserved in the history than completley eliminated. ----DanTD (talk) 14:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 01:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into List of Big Time Rush episodes. Most episodes do not need full pages, but the list could use the content. --khfan93 01:34, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into List of Big Time Rush episodes - No individual article has any particular notability, nor any useful references: all the information rightly belongs together in the Episodes article. SteveStrummer (talk) 07:05, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all Per the above two rationales. Jclemens (talk) 23:13, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.