Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Wingard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Wingard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very little about this lawyer outside of one localish news story more about the commissions. Not noteworthy enough for an article, especially for a BLP, as one local story about his work doesn't fulfill the need for multiple reliable sources. Thargor Orlando (talk) 12:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military and combat-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Faiz Mohammed Ahmed Al Kandari I can't quite work out why the nom describes this as "localish" when the main content of the article is about the subject's difficulties in legally representing one of the Guantanamo detainees, and the sources given include CNN, Salon and a couple of Middle Eastern newspapers. Having said that, while there is enough for notability, the entire notable content would belong just as well in his client's article, so it might be better to have it merged there. PWilkinson (talk) 23:28, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

'Keep' more than a local figure, adequate sourcing,. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (NYPL) (talk • contribs) 21:26, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.