Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avery Clifton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete BLP per consensus. --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 03:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Avery Clifton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Speedy was declined. Subject does not meet the notability requirements of WP:ATHLETE; has never competed professionally or at the highest level of amateur sports (olympic games, etc). Tan | 39 15:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete What admin in their right mind declined the speedy? I'm going to take a look. [Belinrahs|talktome⁄ ididit] 21:29, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "Two Kansas state titles" is an assertion of notability, so declining speedy deletion seems reasonable. Gnome de plume (talk) 21:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Based on the content in the article, the subject does not meet notability guidelines per WP:ATHLETE. Gnome de plume (talk) 21:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I was the admin that declined speedy deletion as it did meet the criteria. However the article does not meet our inclusion standards and should be deleted. Slowly. Rettetast (talk) 22:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No ill will at all to the speedy decline; I would have done the same thing. I noted it in this nomination as a procedural note. Tan | 39 22:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP:ATHLETE. Warrah (talk) 04:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ATHLETE and probably WP:COI. Sluggo | Talk 22:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.