Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auto-lead Data Format
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Auto-lead Data Format (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N; as it is all unreferenced, it would benefit from being TNT'ed regardless. I would be interested to hear from people with more expertise in this area than me. Boleyn (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:20, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Could only find sourcing from either the standards body creating it, or from technology platforms supporting it as a file format, neither of which are independent, and nothing in reliable sources. ~ A412 talk! 07:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.