Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AskWiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:52, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AskWiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Written like ad, single source isn't all that impressive, site no longer working. Delete as non-notable. ZimZalaBim ^talk 02:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep'. Notability does not expire. If it was notable at the time the article was created o, it remains notable today. --Eastmain (talk) 19:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 19:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, I think there may be bias to keep this due to its Wikipedia connections (as with the board of the Foundation in the early days, when said board had articles but weren't really notable themselves), but the article is an advertisement for something that seems to have had little coverage and hasn't became notable yet. If it is kept a rewrite is needed. Esteffect (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unsourced, does not assert notability. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 16:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.