Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ameer Zeb Khan (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ameer Zeb Khan

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A model from Pakistan with who won a "best male model" award in 2008. But he fails all criteria of WP:NMODEL.

He has not had any significant shows. Indeed, the article describes him taking time off to go to university (but not graduate).
He has not made unique or innovative contributions. A source cited in the article does verify the 2008 award, but states:
"... Ameer Zeb Khan has done few memorable campaigns. Models like Rizwan did better work in 2007, are versatile and also far more recognizable than Ameer Zeb. This was a category where one could clearly think of far more deserved winners."[1]
Clearly this person does not meet notability guidelines. Senator2029 【talk】 13:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Pakistan. Senator2029 【talk】 13:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized there was a previous deletion discussion, and reading through it I'm surprised this article was kept. Being famous or popular is insufficient to keep, even if we had substantial sources saying so (which we don't). He won a "people's choice" award for best male model, but the "gaze of fashion" is ephemeral thus even less of a reason to keep. Senator2029 【talk】 13:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Couldn't find anymore RS and the sources cited in the article are not sufficient to pass WP:GNG. The Ref.3 is an interview hence not reliable. The subject won a notable award, but lacks a basic significant coverage. Insight 3 (talk) 14:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see many RS, the brief mentions found are, well, brief mentions. Oaktree b (talk) 17:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reliable sources not visible on this page , Cannot pass WP:RS he is not a notable Model in wikipedia guideline WP:Gng. 🦁 Lionfox 🏹 0909 (talk) 17:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lack of notability + promo style. --Suitskvarts (talk) 15:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.