Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Icarus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 19:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alien Icarus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Ultra Seven through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 18:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 07:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Or Delete Could be merged into Ultra Seven. The page is overly long, badly formatted and with no sources. In addition, the Ultra Seveen Monsters should perhaps go, as well. There doesn't seem to be any notability defined on that page whatsoever. I think they can both me merged into the Ultra Seven page, in a table, with several cells per line, containing salient information like Name, Height,Weigh/Stats, When appeared, Description. scope_creep talk 17:56, 06 October 2013 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all to List of Ultra Seven monsters, as part of the group they are noteworthy but individually they lack sufficient out-of-universe notice to merit individual pages. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 14:20, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge No coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 01:10, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. This has been done rather shabbily. The deletions that have passed should have been merge/redirects. Many of these monsters have appeared in more than one series, and been widely sold and are being sold as action figures. The fact that the articles are not expanding is irrelevant--if the shows have ceased production the complaint is no different than saying dead people's articles should be removed because they are no longer working. μηδείς (talk) 04:41, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:OTHERSTUFF is not relevant; and the fact they are "widely sold" is a WP:BIGNUMBER argument - it does not establish notability. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:44, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - The big problem here is the mass deetion nomination. The articles for Miclas (listed here) and Eleking are quite large, and even with paring down they would still be oversized for the target list. I'd like to know how to have the Miclas listing here removed. I may simply delete it and ask anyone who's interested to nominate it separately. μηδείς (talk) 00:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the Miclas entry from this nomination. It is really in a different class, with multiple appearances in different shows entirely, and a rather large article compared the the rest of the items here which could be comfortably merged into the relevant article. μηδείς (talk) 21:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unnecessary WP:FANCRUFT. jps (talk) 21:12, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge to the monster list, non-notable and extremely unlikely these can be covered by reliable secondary sources. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:17, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all to List of Ultra Seven monsters - none of them meet notability in their own right, but they should be mentioned in the list PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:50, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. None of them are notable. Merging would also be acceptable, but I don't really see the point in trying to merge unreferenced, in-universe writing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.