Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Act III Communications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Act III Communications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete References are not intellectually independent and/or relating to their productions and not to the company itself. Notability is not inherited. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 18:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 21:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 21:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This article could stand some attentive editing, but the company is a highly entertainment/media entity whose activities are covered extensively in reliable sources. Passes GNG and NCORP with ease. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Some of the films that were produced by Act III Communications received some Academy Award nominations in some of the categories. One of the films, Stand by Me received a Golden Globe nomination for best Motion Picture Drama. This is why we should keep it. Evil Idiot 14:14, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.