Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Martin (Football)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have now restored this article as Mr. Martin has made his first start for Southampton F.C., a League One team. Stifle (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Aaron Martin (Football) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject fails both WP:ATHLETE and WG:GNG. Prod of this article was contested on the grounds that he likely meet WP:ATHLETE in the near future. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - although Martin may be in Southampton's first team squad, he has made just one appearance on the substitute's bench without actually playing for the first team in a competitive match. As the highest level at which he has actually played is
Conference SouthConference National, he does not reach the notability requirements of WP:ATHLETE. If he makes it in the Football League, the article can be re-created then. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] - Delete: Saying that he will pass ATHLETE is a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Delete for now with no prejudice against recreation should he make his first-team debut in the future. BigDom 19:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. SilverserenC 19:18, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. SilverserenC 19:18, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have added some sources to the article, enough to qualify him for WP:GNG, as they are significant coverage about him. He also passes WP:ATHLETE because he plays for Football League One, which is accepted as a fully professional league, which means that he meets #1 of WP:ATHLETE. So, all in all, he meets both notability standards handily. SilverserenC 19:18, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - he may be on the books of a Football League One club, he has never played for them; thus, he fails WP:ATHLETE. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 19:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Despite all of those sources that the guy above me added, he has yet to pass Wp:ATHLETE or Wp:GNG. (And he needs to re-read Wp:ATHLETE - you need to play for them, rather than merely being a member of their team.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 19:29, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Can someone please update me what Wp:ATHLETE and Wp:GNG is? I gather that they have to have apps for a professional club but doesn't Salisbury count with 13 apps and a goal for Aaron? thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monts 94sfc (talk • contribs) 19:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Please just click on those links and read. Thanks. — Satori Son 19:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've clicked on the links Wp:ATHLETE says a fully professional athlete like the olympics which could be the equivalent to the premier league down to the conference premier. Wp:GNG says i have to log in and something about an email when i am logged in. I am new member thus the confusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monts 94sfc (talk • contribs) 19:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I don't know why it's not properly directing you to WP:GNG. Try this full URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GNG#General_notability_guideline — Satori Son 20:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment to Monts 94sfc - We have a list of fully-professional leagues, and the appearance of a player in one of them grants them notability. Due to the presence of teams like Histon and Hayes & Yeading (both of whom are amatuer teams), the Conference National isn't considered fully-professional. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 23:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've clicked on the links Wp:ATHLETE says a fully professional athlete like the olympics which could be the equivalent to the premier league down to the conference premier. Wp:GNG says i have to log in and something about an email when i am logged in. I am new member thus the confusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monts 94sfc (talk • contribs) 19:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Please just click on those links and read. Thanks. — Satori Son 19:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Clearly does not meet the standards Wp:ATHLETE. Perhaps with more references, or claims other actions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freakee73 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have added a total of 9 references to cover all of Aaron's career, although it doesn't meet Wp:ATHLETE , it should meet WP:GNG as they are significant coverage about him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monts 94sfc (talk • contribs) 00:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I would like to point out that GNG requires significan coverage, not just sources. What you've added is fairly routine journalism. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Our other option would be to incubate the article for a little while until his Saints debut, which, looking at various sources, seems like it should be in a month or so. SilverserenC 00:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Most of the coverage seems on news sites that require you to pay to read their archives, but there is clearly plenty of the football player. [1] Dream Focus 00:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Most of these G-hits predate this Martin's career and relate to various American Football players. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This search is a bit more precise. I think I see five hits in there about this guy, mainly local press covering his signing for a pro club in a "local boy made good" sort of way....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete footballer fails WP:ATH. Also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of significant media coverage that does not fail WP:NTEMP. --Jimbo[online] 13:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - if the article is kept, it should be moved to the correct title Aaron Martin (footballer)........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 21:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- Put Back on Immediatley -
What a waste of time for me creating it and you deleting it, he is making his DEBUT TODAY for Southampton alongside Jose Fonte at Centre Back!!!