User talk:Ukexpat/Archive 43
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ukexpat. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | → | Archive 50 |
unreviewed articles
Hi, could you please review the following articles for me, when you have time: Croftinloan School, Doug Mitchell (film producer) and Alan Watson Featherstone. I have been waiting for almost five months for the Croftinloan article to be reviewed! Obviously, a lack of editors. (You previously reviewed my article for John Henderson Sinclair last year) Many thanks. Gomach (talk) 09:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:43, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Help desk, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- WTF are you talking about? Turning URLs into Wikilinks? I've been doing that for years an no one has batted an eyelid. And BTW, please read WP:DTTR.--ukexpat (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- No worries. I left it as-was, because it is clearer; I'd just always tried to regard other users' comments as sacrosanct. Please feel free to delete this entire section, though; I was needlessly officious, and I apologise. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- RE: DTTR - it didn't occur to me that the template would tell you 'Welcome to Wikipedia'. That is, of course, absurd. My apologies once again. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:30, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2014
- News and notes: The English Wikipedia's second featured-article centurion; wiki inventor interviewed on video
- Featured content: Zombie fight in the saloon
- Traffic report: Get fitted for flipflops and floppy hats
- Recent research: Predicting which article you will edit next
Just so you know ...
Fiorano Software was salted over four years ago. Daniel Case (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- OK thanks.--ukexpat (talk) 18:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Invitation to vote on an article
hello. since you are an editor of the article Ammar ibn Yasir, would you be interested in voting for it to make it a featured article or not? thank you for your time Grandia01 (talk) 12:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Mike V • Talk 01:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
GOCE June 2014 newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors May 2014 backlog elimination drive wrap-up
Participation: Thanks to all who participated! Out of 51 people who signed up this drive, 33 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: We reduced our article backlog from 2,987 articles to 2,236 articles in May, the lowest backlog total since we began keeping records in 2009! Since at least 300 new articles were tagged during May, that means we copy edited over 1,000 articles in a single month. Amazing work, everyone! Blitz: The June blitz will run from June 15–21. This blitz's theme is Politics. Sign up here. Election: You can nominate yourself or others for the role of Coordinator for the second half of 2014 here. Nominations will be accepted until June 14. Voting will begin on June 15 and will conclude on June 28. Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
|
My article Abel Laureano wasn't accepted
My article Abel Laureano wasn't accepted. Sincerely I don't know what to do to make it acceptable. Can you tell me what I did wrong? Many thanks. Maria RentoMaria.Rento IESF (talk) 21:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- You need to cite reliable sources that demonstrate that he meets the WP:BIO guidelines. If you need further help please ask at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.--ukexpat (talk) 02:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 June 2014
- News and notes: Two new affiliate-selected trustees
- Featured content: Ye stately homes of England
- In the media: Reliable or not, doctors use Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Autumn in summer
Thank you so much. I see you fixed my link tagging. What is the next step. I am concerned that my article is not in my original sandbox. When I click my sandbox in the top menu it takes me to another link appearing on the left. It's a small link that says "Sandbox/GreenLips User". When I click there my article does appear—and nicely linked, thanks to you. Any help is appreciated. GreenLips (talk) 14:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- The draft is in a user sandbox - I moved it from your user page to User:GreenLips/Sandbox. You really need to add more references to the early part of the article. I fear that if you resubmit it now, it will be rejected again for not having enough references. When you are ready to resubmit it add the text {{Subst:submit}} at the top and click save. --ukexpat (talk) 21:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)\
- Dear Ukexpat,
- Thank you, thank you, thank you. I found you to be the most helpful. Please continue to review our article titled Bill Haney. Your kindness and helpfulness is appreciated. I don't know how my article got in the wrong area. I couldn't figure out how to get it back in my original sandbox for my review. Thank you for moving it there. Again, your help and sage advice is very much appreciated. I will follow your advice.GreenLips (talk) 14:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 June 2014
- News and notes: PR agencies commit to ethical interactions with Wikipedia
- Traffic report: The week the wired went weird
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Moderator: William Beutler
- Special report: Questions raised over secret voting for WMF trustees
- Featured content: Politics, ships, art, and cyclones
HealthDay page
Hi Ukexpat,
Please don't delete the HealthDay page. It is similar to Reuters health and has tons of great health content available daily. The news website is consumer.healthday.com and has free articles and videos. It is not spam since the articles written are from health reports and medical journals. HealthDay is not a pharmaceutical company. I agree with the changes you made. It's much shorter and easier for people to find information.
Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReynaLarios (talk • contribs) 19:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- I am not an admin so I cannot delete the article - I have just nominated it for deletion. If you want it to remain you must cite some additional sources that demonstrate that the business is notable per the guidelines at WP:CORP.--ukexpat (talk) 20:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 June 2014
- News and notes: With paid advocacy in its sights, the Wikimedia Foundation amends their terms of use
- Featured content: Worming our way to featured picture
- Special report: Wikimedia Bangladesh: a chapter's five-year journey
- Traffic report: You can't dethrone Thrones
- WikiProject report: Visiting the city
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 June 2014
- News and notes: US National Archives enshrines Wikipedia in Open Government Plan
- Traffic report: Fake war, or real sport?
- Exclusive: "We need to be true to who we are": Foundation's new executive director speaks to the Signpost
- Discussion report: Media Viewer, old HTML tags
- Featured content: Showing our Wörth
- WikiProject report: The world where dreams come true
- Recent research: Power users and diversity in WikiProjects
GOCE July 2014 newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors July 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights:
– Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
|
Welcome thanks
Thanks very much. Think I'm on top of things now - very useful links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adproductionguy (talk • contribs) 15:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 July 2014
- In the media: Wiki Education; medical content; PR firms
- Traffic report: The Cup runneth over... and over.
- News and notes: Wikimedia Israel receives Roaring Lion award
- Featured content: Ship-shape
- WikiProject report: Indigenous Peoples of North America
- Technology report: In memoriam: the Toolserver (2005–14)
No edit conflict?
We edited at practically the same time on the helpdesk. How did this not cause an edit conflict? I submitted after you did, but my comment is above yours. How is this possible? Piguy101 (talk) 21:02, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- I have no idea!--ukexpat (talk) 21:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- That's funny. Piguy101 (talk) 21:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- I am content just to gnome away. The inner workings of Wikipedia are a mystery to me.--ukexpat (talk) 21:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- That's funny. Piguy101 (talk) 21:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Grace College
I noticed you changed corrections that were made to the Grace College & Seminary page. You changed things that were correct, do you have any connection with Grace? Why are you changing these corrections? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpintern4 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- No I have no connection with Grace. My changes were solely to make the article conform to Wikpedia's policies, guidelines and manual of style. Please continue any content-related discussion on the article's talk page. Thanks.--ukexpat (talk) 18:13, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 July 2014
- Special report: Wikimania 2014—what will it cost?
- Wikimedia in education: Exploring the United States and Canada with LiAnna Davis
- Featured content: Three cheers for featured pictures!
- News and notes: Echoes of the past haunt new conflict over tech initiative
- Traffic report: World Cup, Tim Howard rule the week
Society for Planetary SETI Research
Dear UKexpat,
The note below is in response to the Speedy Deletion of a submitted article on The Society for Planetary SETI Research.
From Horace Crater to "Ukexpat". Please let me know if the material I provide below is sufficient for me to use the first few paragraphs from my website http://spsr.utsi.edu in the formation of my proposed Wikepedia articles. Let me know if there is any thing else I can provide to you.
Thanks
The following sentences were formed based on the website https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CONSENT..
I hereby affirm that I, (Horace Crater), am the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the web site http://spsr.utsi.edu I agree to publish a portion of that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
My name is Horace Crater. The web site is a faculty web site at the University of Tennessee Space Institute. I am the owner of the content of that web site. I wish to use only a portion of that web site http://spsr.utsi.edu for which I am copyright owner (in particular the introductory descriptive paragraphs as an introduction to a proposed Wikipedia article. Since I am the owner there is no issue of copyright for that text. I am a professor at my institute and my email address is hcrater@utsi.edu. The web master here can verify the information I am sending to you. His name and email address is Richard Gulley, rgulley@utsi.edu.
Hcrater (talk) 19:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- I am sorry but you must communicate permission to Wikipedia via the process described at WP:IOWN.--ukexpat (talk) 19:48, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 July 2014
- Special report: $10 million lawsuit against Wikipedia editors withdrawn, but plaintiff intends to refile
- Traffic report: World Cup dominates for another week
- Wikimedia in education: Serbia takes the stage with Filip Maljkovic
- Featured content: The Island with the Golden Gun