User talk:Sriramnani141

SARASWATI TEMPLE AT WARGAL

Hi, I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. Jimfbleak. ^{Talk to me.}08:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that if you keep posting this article under different names, you may be blocked from contributing. Jimfbleak. ^{Talk to me.}08:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gajwel, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Thaurisil^t_c 07:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gajwel, you will be blocked from editing. Thaurisil^t_c 07:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Guruvannapeta, you will be blocked from editing. Thaurisil^t_c 07:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 72 hours for vandalism. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. If you wish to contest this block, please do so by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on your page, and somebody will come by shortly to review this action. Riana (talk) 07:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Saraswati temple wargal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Midorihana_{(talk)(contribs)} 09:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Wargal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Midorihana_{(talk)(contribs)} 10:05, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked. Midorihana_{(talk)(contribs)} 10:05, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wargal, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Wargal Saraswati Temple. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Wargal. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ironholds (talk) 07:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming an article is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. – PranksterTurtle ^(talk) 07:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]