User talk:Snake bgd/Archive2

E, javi se ponekad. Zlatko 01:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:JNA Logo.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E, dodao sam sliku za gracanina. Pogledaj je kad imas vremena. Pozdrav. Zlatko 01:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dos-yu.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:21, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Snake, I'm with you; I believe Yugoslavia will once again become one nation, and prevent these fascist Leaders from rising again. I'm with you comrade; (Tovarishch) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.157.147.168 (talk) 03:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you revert this? Since when is defence minister a military post? --89.172.35.142 10:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know the answer to my question at Talk:Military_ranks_of_the_Soviet_Union#All_forces_ranks? It relates to one of your edits. Thanks. - Shaheenjim 03:25, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. Someone else answered it. - Shaheenjim 03:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correct me if Im wrong but seems to me that you added Petar Gošev as a predecesor of Kiro Gligorov, as a president of the SR Macedonia. Im not sure if that info is correct. There's a list of politicians in the SRM article but I cant be sure about its reliability too. Hmm what to do? As my memory serves me, Petar Gošev was the leader of the League of Communists of Macedonia which was a ruling party, but he was not exactly a president of the country (there was a collective presidency as far as I know but he was not a president of that). I will try to find something on this and if i do find i will change it. If you have any idea let me know --Dzole 01:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW I found (at least I think I found): see Faculty of Law, Skopje professor Vladimir Mitkov. The page says he was a "president of the presidency of SRM". Thats the man (again, it seems so). --Dzole 02:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you have a love for labelling posts as military. Could you please explain to me how is "President of Serbian Presidency" military post? You marked it as such on Nikola Ljubičić article. Secondly, how is "Federal Prime Minister of Yugoslavia" and "President of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia" a military post (on Tito article)? And, then, of course, how is "Federal secretary of people's defence" a military post? All of those are civilian posts that were held by military people That doesn't make it military post. If my father is general, that doesn't mean all fathers are generals. I will now change this posts to civilian posts, and I ask you to answer me here before reverting. Thanks. --78.0.82.127 09:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• First log on so that we can talk. And second i did write that a Federal Prime Minister of Yugoslavia is in Tito's Yugoslavia held a rank by military officer, and it was a rank of General of the Army or Admiral of the Navy. ^{Snake bgd} 16:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me... you are telling me that federal prime minister always held a rank of general/admiral? That is the only way I can understand your sentence. So, was Milka Planinc general or admiral? You are talking nonsence. And, you again changed tag of minister of defence can you provide a reference for that? A law which says that minister of defence is military post? --78.0.76.65 (talk) 17:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• My mistake not federal prime minister but federal secretary of people's defence. Usualy every politician in Tito's Yugoslavia held some rank in (JNA) but in reserve in case of war, those are all politican how had been in World War II. Federal secretary of people's defence or today defence minister was in Tito's Yugoslavia a military post because only military personel can become that. SFRY at any time if War begain will have every citisent in the army mobilesed. ^{Snake bgd} 13:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Shotokan_Tiger.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jusjih 02:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(♠Taifarious1♠) 02:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:WoW Wrath of the Lich King.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I apologize for the spam. You are receiving this message because you have indicated that you are in Southern California or interested in Southern California topics (either via category or WikiProject).

I would like to invite you to the Los Angeles edition of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art, a photography scavenger hunt to be held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) on Saturday, February 28, 2009, from 1:00 to 7:00 PM. All photos are intended for use in Wikipedia articles or on Wikimedia Commons. There will be a prize available for the person who gets the most photos on the list.

If you don't like art, why not come just to meet your fellow Wikipedians. Apparently, we haven't had a meetup in this area since June 2006!

If you are interested in attending, please add your name to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art#Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Please make a note if you are traveling to the area (train or plane) and need transportation, which can probably be arranged via carpool, but we need time to coordinate. Lodging is as of right now out of scope, but we could discuss that if enough people are interested.

Thank you and I hope to see you there! howcheng {chat} 00:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marshal of Yugoslavia insignia.gif is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Marshal of Yugoslavia insignia.gif. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Marshal of Yugoslavia insignia.gif]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Branko Kostic.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:TORS.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Killiondude (talk) 00:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to World of Warcraft: Cataclysm has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful when "rewriting" material that there was not good reason for its removal. In your rewrite, there is even the remnant of the copyright tag that was removed out of process: [1]. The edit summaries make clear that this material was removed to comply with copyright policy, as does the note at the talk page. It must not be restored. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Snake bgd! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 251 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Branko Mamula - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TORS.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eleassar ^{my talk} 09:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nebojsa Pavkovic.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:26, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dragoljub Ojadnic.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:26, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think Zorandobrosavljevic (talk · contribs) tried to leave a message for you (they created Discussion with user:Snake bgd which was speedy deleted). You might like to speak to the user, if interested. Johnuniq (talk) 10:20, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Snake bgd/Archive2! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the project. --Kumioko (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With the first of what I hope will be monthly newsletters I again want to welcome you to the project and hope that as we all work together through the year we can expand the project, create missing articles and generally improve the pedia thought mutual cooperation and support. Now that we have a project and a solid pool of willing members I wanted to strike while the iron is hot and solicite help in doing a few things that I believe is a good next step in solidifiing the project. I have outlined a few suggestions where you can help with on the projects talk page. This includes but is not limited too updating Portal:United States, assessing the remaining US related articles that haven't been assessed, eliminating the Unrefernced BLP's and others. If you have other suggestions or are interested in doing other things feel free. I just wanted to offer a few suggestions were additional help is needed. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, comments or suggestions or you can always post something on the projects talk page. If you do not want to recieve a monthly message please put an * before your name on the members page.--Kumioko (talk) 05:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Starting with the February 2011 issue WikiProject United States has established a newsletter to inform anyone interested in United States related topics of the latest changes. This newsletter will not only discuss issues relating to WikiProject United States but also:

1. Portal:United States
2. the United States Wikipedians Noticeboard
3. the United States Wikipedians collaboration of the Month - The collaboration article for February is Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
4. and changes to Wikipolicy, events and other things that may be of interest to you.

You may read or assist in writing the newsletter, subscribe, unsubscribe or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following this link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page or the Newsletters talk page. --Kumioko (talk) 21:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I drew the JTO logo in Inkscape but am really uncertain about the colors. Please change or advise me so I can change so that they are correct. The shield's outer rim is a dark grey in the svg, should it be black instead? The hues of the red and blue are taken from my imagination (with a little help from the washed out jpg image - looks like a scan of a textile patch

).

Any and all comments are appreciated.

gs (talk) 08:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that you liked the JTO logo but don't quite understand what part you want olive gray! The JTO logo has black on the outside then white then red- a different and in my view less appealing red than the Logo_of_the_JNA by Apiya then blue and some artwork in "gold" (yellow) then the star in the same red as part of the shield border.

I'm afraid that the eagles in the other logos you posted are a bit too time consuming for me at this point, sorry The resolution is too poor to make a reasonable trace too so it would take me a week to draw the eagle!

gs (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 01:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
. --Kumioko (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2001 Serbian policemans.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 23:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United States National Archives WikiProject

Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts. There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 13:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 01:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	National Archives Backstage Pass at the Reagan Library
	You are invited to the first-ever backstage pass tour and Wikipedia editathon hosted by the Reagan Presidential Library, in Simi Valley, on Saturday, November 19th! The Reagan Library, home to a real Air Force One and other treasures from American history, will take Wikipedians on a special tour of the grounds and archives, followed by an editathon; free catered lunch provided. Please sign up! Dominic·t 21:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
	If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite.

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 03:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Kosta Nadj.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vrhovnik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vrhovnik until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GregorB (talk) 15:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably clear that the rank/title does not exist at the moment. It is not a good idea to use the article to make a point about Tuđman, see WP:COATRACK. GregorB (talk) 17:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that may be an argument in the deletion discussion, but - as I explained - there are four problematic points, and merely saying that something existed is not enough (WP:EXIST). GregorB (talk) 18:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed you uploaded File:Naramenica odore vrhovnika HV.svg - but the sourcing note at the Commons does not really provide any source. Could you please point out a source for the image? Thanks!--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Korean People's Army Ground Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Kim Il-sung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Leader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Živojin Mišić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief of the General Staff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Snake bgd,

I don't understand why you don't want to add your information to the article Democratic Party (Yugoslavia). You know that Wikipedia is based on WP:Verifiability and WP:Neutral point of view. It is not acceptable to take up the position of the Democratic Party (which is not neutral!) instead of the position of independent scholars. Therefore Wikipedia has two separate articles about the two parties: Democratic Party (Yugoslavia) for the pre-war party and Democratic Party (Serbia) for the post-1989 party. I ask you to please keep this separation, because the identity and continuity of both parties is not verifiable with reliable sources. The Democratic Party claims to be identical and to be the continuation of the old Democratic Party. But neutral, third-party academic sources do not confirm this. The website of the DS is not a neutral, third-party scholarly source. It is the opposite of neutral and third-party. Please also note that if one of your edits gets reverted, you are held to discuss the issue on the respective talk page instead of just re-reverting. The latter approach could be considered quite uncooperative and even close to WP:Edit warring. I would suggest you not to go that way. Thank you for your understanding and your cooperation. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 12:51, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the source you have provided is quite contradictory. It says "Demokratska stranka, ključna članica vladajuće koalicije, napunila je 20 godina života" ("Democratic Party, a key member of the ruling coalition, has turned 20 years old") 20! So it was founded 1989, not 1919, according to the article you provided. The article only tells the history of DS since 1989, not the pre-war history, therefore it is not honest to cite it as an evidence for the pre-war history and for the identity and continuity of the new/old party. Moreover real scholarly/academic sources would be preferable over news magazine articles. If you need help or advice for editing the article please don't hesitate to ask me or to use the talk page. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 13:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, it is absolutely not okay to revert again and again and again if there is a dispute ongoing. There is a rule on Wikipedia called the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. It means that you may be bold the first time. But if one of your edits gets reverted you are held to discuss and you must not re-revert again and again and again. You have done that four times already. You make it really difficult to collaborate with you, because actually your approach is called WP:Edit warring. If you continue this way it could lead to a block for you. So please respect the rules and discuss your edits instead of being stubborn and inserting the same thing again and again. I really cannot understand why you don't want to edit the article Democratic Party (Yugoslavia). Wikipedia has made two articles. One for the historic party at Democratic Party (Yugoslavia), and one for the present-day existing party at Democratic Party (Serbia). This is for the reason, that after more than forty years, it is very difficult to prove that it is still the same party.

The Demokratska Stranka claims to be the legal successor. But here on Wikipedia, we don't write from the DS's point of view (POV). We write from a neutral POV. That means, you have to prove your claims with publications of independent scholars and not from the party's website. The newspaper article is okay, but it is not as good as a publication by a real scholar, a historian or a political scientist. I have provided a book by Janusz Bugajski as a source. He writes that:

"The party claimed its roots in the Democratic Party founded at the beginning of the twentieth century (...)"

Janusz Bugajski is a political science expert for the New European Democracies Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. I think he is more credible and reliable than a newsmagazine article, not to mention the party's website. And your newsmagazine article does not actually support your statements, because it only treats the history of the DS after 1989 and not before 1948. So you do not have a valid reliable source! Do you understand, that the history as described on the DS's website is not a neutral, third-party reliable source? Moreover, we already have an article on the Democratic Party (Yugoslavia). It would be redundant to treat the same story twice. So why don't you just edit this article? You want to write about the Democratic Party of Yugoslavia that has existed between 1919 and 1948, here is your article: Democratic Party (Yugoslavia).

Additionally, please do some research and try to find reliable sources. Statements that do not refer to reliable sources are not accepted on Wikipedia, even if they are true. (Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth!) If you are not sure whether or not to consider a source reliable, check Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, ask other users, like me, ask on the article's talk page, or post the source at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard for assessment. This is a community. You are not alone. That means that you always can get help. But it also means that you cannot do everything single-handedly. This is not a one-man show. I am looking forward to better cooperation with you in the future. Again, if you have any question, please ask me or ask any other user. All the best and kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 20:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that I don't trust you. It's not that I don't believe you. I believe that you are very-well informed and have a lot of knowledge on this subject. But again, the principle of Wikipedia is Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. Maybe it is hard to understand or to accept. But even if you are very well-informed and you have a lot of knowledge and you are absolutely sure it's true, Wikipedia cannot accept it if you do not provide WP:Reliable sources to verify it. Your own knowledge (even if you are an expert, and I am willing to assume you are) is considered WP:Original research and is not accepted. The website of the Democratic Party is not considered a reliable source. The Serbian Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source. Please do some research, go to a library or university or search at Google Books or Google Scholar and find a history book or political science book, written by an independent scholar, published by a university, or research center or renowned publishing house to verify what you claim.

Yet another thing is: if you find that Democratic Party (Yugoslavia) and Democratic Party (Serbia) are one and the same party and should have one single Wikipedia article, you have to request the merger of both articles. Then, the community has to decide whether or not to merge both articles. If no one objects, you can merge both articles. But you cannot do it just like that and on your own. There are rules of cooperation here. And if you just do anything on your own, without discussing it with the others, you won't make friends. You find the procedure to merge two articles at Wikipedia:Merging and Help:Merging. If you need more help, please don't hesitate to ask me, I will be glad to assist you. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 00:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I may give you some advise, I would recommend to do the research first and present at least one reliable source that confirms that both parties are actually the same. Without a source, I would not approve of the merger. I have already idicated you above, where you can find reliable sources. Without some research, this project will not be successful. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 12:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. The Political and Economic Dictionary of Eastern Europe, which I would consider a reliable source, does not mention the continuity with the pre-war Democratic Party either. So I would really recommend you to search and present at least one source that really confirms your position. However, I have found several sources that could help us to improve the Democratic Party (Yugoslavia) article: [2], [3], [4], [5], --RJFF (talk) 12:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then I guess that you have to leave the computer and go to a library or bookshop or university and find it. Tis source at least speaks of a "revival". It's a bit shallow, but it could do. Still I am not 100% convinced. I still think it is better to keep 2 articles. --RJFF (talk) 12:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please compare Slovene People's Party (historical) and Slovenian People's Party - 2 articles; People's Party (Kingdom of Croatia) and Croatian People's Party – Liberal Democrats - 2 articles. National Peasants' Party and Christian-Democratic National Peasants' Party (Romania) - 2 articles; People's Party (Poland) and Polish People's Party - 2 articles; Party of Rights (1861–1929) and Croatian Party of Rights - 2 articles - see: there is always the same story with the East European parties, they always see themselves in historic continuity and legal successorship. Still Wikipedia treats them in two articles because they were active in two different historical eras. Could you accept this? --RJFF (talk) 12:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But this mention of the roots in the historical party should be much shorter. I think the sentence "They claimed their roots in the Democratic Party which had existed in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and was banned by the communists after World War II." is enough. You are telling the whole history of the historical Democratic Party, which should be done at Democratic Party (Yugoslavia), and not at Democratic Party (Serbia). There should be clean cut between both articles and not too many redundancies. Would you like to move your text to Democratic Party (Yugoslavia) and insert it there? --RJFF (talk) 12:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Great American Wikinic at Pan-Pacific Park
	You are invited to the second Great American Wikinic taking place in Pan-Pacific Park, in Los Angeles, on Saturday, June 23, 2012! Last year's was a blast (see the LA Weekly blog post on it) and we hope we can do better this year. We would love to have you there! —howcheng {chat} 04:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
	If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite.

[6] -- Director (talk) 04:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Ivan Gosnjak.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:49, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:World of Warcraft - Mists of Pandaria.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of Presidents of Serbia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 22:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]