User talk:Savolya

Welcome also. I feel like an undertaker welcoming you, because I killed your large contribution to naphthalene. I moved your essay to the Talk page as a temporary parking place. What you wrote is fine, but it belongs in its own article on "Naphthalene sulfonic acids". If you want some help, just ask. It is generally the policy that chemical articles are about that specific chemical, not its derivatives. There are exceptions, but in my judgement this is not one of them. Dont take this message as being negative but as an opportunity to create a welcome article.--Smokefoot (talk) 01:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. The area you identified would also make a nice full article since significant technology exist there. You also might look at Naphthalenesulfonates. We welcome potential editors that can bring diverse perspectives to these articles and your experience would ensure such a perspective.--Smokefoot (talk) 14:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure - I just read about the good priest, and was inspired to clean up his biography a little. - Biruitorul ^Talk 02:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. Koshoes (talk) 15:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please show me the discussion where consensus was determined to change the date template in articles from WP:ACTOR. It has not been broached on the project talk page, nor can I tell that it has been determined by consensus that the present use is acceptable. My understanding is that at present this is essentially a trial/study, etc. and from reading some discussion pages, I do not see that it has been accepted on a wholesale basis. Please do not change any more infoboxes related to this project without first obtaining consensus from the project. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he is doing a study/trial/whatever and chose a few articles from some projects in order to study how the template is working. It wasn't an endorsement to start changing the templates on all articles, and inclusion in the study hasn't been broached with the WP:ACTOR project. At present, there is no consensus determination to start inserting these changes project wide. Whenever it is that they have all the bugs worked out and consensus agrees to using the different template, they will have a bot make the changes. At present, however, there was no agreement to put them on all biographies. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking and it occurred to me that there is something you can do while you're doing other editing. If you come across a biography that still has the date links in the opening sentence, you could go ahead and de-link them. The date linking has been deprecated on Wikipedia because clicking those links takes one to an endless list of things totally unrelated to the biography itself. Just a suggestion. Thanks again. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful when using material from copyrighted websites. This edit to Joyce Compton copied verbatim the contents of this site which is subject to copyright as per the copyright notice at the bottom of the source page. I realize this took place when you were relatively new to Wikipedia and our policies regarding copyright can be confusing, but this type of edit is considered a copyright violation. Thanks Rossrs (talk) 08:43, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I note you said on Rossrs talk page:

I did not edit "Joyce Compton".

You need to be more careful.

Savolya (talk) 10:03, 10 May 2009(UTC)savolyaSavolya (talk) 10:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

I think this contradicts that statement. Wildhartlivie (talk) 10:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the image on Mudd's Women is non-free content which has to pass the non-free content criteria on every article is is placed on. It will never pass the criteria on the Susan Denberg article. Garion96 (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion on possibly moving Nazi plunder. As you are currently a reasonably active editor, as well as a past contributor to the article, I hope you can find some time to make comments at renaming Nazi plunder. Unschool 17:46, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Margo Woode requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Watching TCM today? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Is there a reason why you keep removing the marriage templates from the infobox on the Franchot Tone article? You have done so twice and your only explanation is "infobox update". If you read Template:Infobox actor, you'll see only the spouse's name and years the subject and spouse were married should go into that parameter (hence the usage of the very convenient marriage template). There's no reason to add "divorced" after the name as most people can figure out the couple divorced especially if there's another name directly after it. Further, the article itself should give that information as the infobox's purpose is to serve as a simple overview of the subject. Unless you have a policy based reason for removing the template, please do not continue to remove it under the guise of "updating". Thanks. Pinkadelica^♣ 21:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a respected WP editor, you are invited to participate in the following discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clyde Lucas (2nd nomination)

Thank you for the invitation Savolya (talk) 18:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)savolyaSavolya (talk) 18:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, that is some movie, I just caught the last 15 minutes or so now on tv. I deleted the cast list you added because the article you added that list to is about the stage musical. The movie has its own article, at DuBarry Was a Lady (film)- the cast list on the film article looks complete to me, but why not take a look to be sure. JeanColumbia (talk) 13:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now you have Peter Goodwin dying twice. First because of the cotton collapse and then at the race track on the way to the winner's circle. 4.240.117.90 (talk) 09:16, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

¿Y bien? 4.240.117.206 (talk) 22:08, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just thought you'd like to know that Template:Infobox actor is no longer used, as it now redirects to Template:Infobox person. Thanks! Lugnuts (talk) 14:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you created this article (in June this year) but the first line calls it "The Story on Page One". Is this an alternative title or something else? Either way, the first line should match the article name. Boissière (talk) 21:53, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Inez Courtney, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Neptune, New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Savolya. Thanks for your work cleaning up infoboxes and links. I wanted to let you know about an odd quirk to do with ELs to Allrovi (formerly AllMovie Guide). They do not work if you use the "1:" that is at the start of their number. For example the one you just added to Scrooge {{amg movie|id=1:43275}} will go to a page that has a cute picture of the volleyball Wilson from the film Castaway and give you an error message. If you remove the "1:" thus {{amg movie|id=43275}} it will go to their page for the film. I don't know if this is a quirk of our template or the alteration in that website when it changed names but the links wont work the old way. Also our EL templates have been updated and you dont have to include the "id=" if you don't want to. Thus this {{amg movie|43275}} will work just fine. Now you don't have to leave it out if you are used to using it - the link will still work - but you can save a little time if you want to. I hope that this is of help but if it is too confusing just let me know and I will try to explain it better. Cheers and happy holidays. MarnetteD | Talk 23:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Cindy Morgan needs a source. To the best of my knowledge - and Cindy's a personal friend - she's never been married, and certainly never had a child. -- Jay Maynard (talk) 13:33, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one who added the information about Glen Morgan and the child; I was suggesting that you should provide a source if you had one, since I was unable to locate any information about that at all. -- Jay Maynard (talk) 17:12, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The MySpace page you added says nothing at all about Cindy Morgan. -- Jay Maynard (talk) 22:47, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove "refimprove" tags unless you have added sufficient references to an article to verify all of the assertions made in it. For example, you removed a refimprove tag from the article Anna and the King of Siam (film), but that article is woefully under-referenced. The maintenance tag is there to draw attention to the article to encourage someone to do the research necessary to properly reference the article. Please see WP:V and WP:RS for more information. Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 10:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my edit summary reverting your most recent change to the article. I misunderstood what you'd done. In any event, age doesn't normally go in that parenthetical, so please leave it out. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Savolya,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Crowded Sky for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Matty.007 (talk) 08:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Crowded Sky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.allmovie.com/movie/the-crowded-sky-v88270. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Matty.007 (talk) 08:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Savolya,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Crowded Sky for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Matty.007 (talk) 09:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Crowded Sky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Matty.007 (talk) 09:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Savolya. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Crowded Sky, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Matty.007 (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Crowded Sky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Matty.007 (talk) 09:44, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So I'm guessing we both saw this thing on TV today and went -- what? ;-) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:03, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Savolya,

This is just a courtesy visit to inform you that I took the liberty to make a slight addition to your article supported by references. I hope you'd like my little effort. I'd appreciate your say on this. Best regards. (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 16:37, 19 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maisie (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Maisie (film)|Maisie]] (1939}<ref>http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0047910/?ref_=tt_cl_t1</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:55, 9 November 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Red Cloud may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• about the book, The Heart of Everything That Is: The Untold Story of Red Cloud, An American Legend]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wilson Collison may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | spouse = Anzonetta Moore (?-1941) (his death

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Seems Like Old Times (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• The bank's picture of Nick comes to the attention of Los Angeles district attorney Ira Parks ([[Charles Grodin]) when his assistant, Fred ([[Charles Grodin]), recognizes it to be Parks' wife's ex-husband. Because of his desire to become

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Crowded Sky, Savolya!

Wikipedia editor Tritario just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Awesome job with this page! Keep up the good work! This page is now marked as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Tritario's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hey Savolya, it's great to replace USA with U.S., but please don't wikilink it per WP:OVERLINK. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Very Thought of You (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | based on = ''The Very Thought of You''<br>(1944 Warner Bros. (story)<ref>http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Very_Thought_of_You.html?id=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tea and Sympathy (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * Kip King]] as Ted

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:23, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you should be changing film infoboxes the way you have been. My understanding is that the "writer" field is for when a film has a single writer. If the film is based on a novel or previously published short story, that should appear in the "based on" field with the title of the work the film is based on and the date it was published. This is because putting the writer of the source material in the "writer" field makes it appear that person wrote the film, but that is not the case. It would be good if you would go back and fix those infoboxes you have altered so that they won't give the reader an incorrect impression. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Savolya, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on The Big Show (1961 film), appears to be directly copied from http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-big-show/1053014/main. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on The Big Show (1961 film) if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 16:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Montana Moon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Joan Prescott, ([Joan Crawford]]), a vacuous daughter of a wealthy, [[Montana]] rancher, meets Larry ([[Johnny Mack Brown|John Mack

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Prince and the Pauper (1937 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * {{amg movie|39182}}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:24, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Maria Charles, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 03:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Egyptian (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * Peter Reynolds] as Sinuhe, age 10

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Prince and the Showgirl may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• it necessary to pamper the royals during their stay in London, and thus civil servant Northbrook ([[Richard Wattis]]} is detached to their service. Northbrook decides to take the Prince Regent ([[Laurence Olivier]])

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Red Dust may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * {{tcmdb title|id=390}}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Plot Thickens (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | screenplay = [Jack Townley]]<br>Clarence Upson Young
• who now tries to figure out the connection between two unrelated murders. Inspector Oscar Piper ([[James Gleason]]}, is Hildegarde's friendly nemesis.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Van Johnson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | children = Schuyler V. Johnson (b. 1948}<ref>http://www.nndb.com/people/654/000031561/</ref>
• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:10, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to They Died with Their Boots On may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Warner Bros. films]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for creating new film articles, such as Youngblood Hawke (1964 film), but the plot is a direct copy from a published source. Please read WP:COPYVIO and note that copyrighted text can't be duplicated here under any circumstances. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 20:15, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And the copied plots have been removed from these articles:

• The Law (1959 film)
• Let's Be Happy
• Man in the Middle (film)
• The Loves of Edgar Allan Poe

Please review your edits on film plots. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 20:20, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mike Kellin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | birth_place = [[Hartford, Connecticut|Hartford]], [[Connecticut]], U.S.]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Another Thin Man may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | writer = [[Dashiell Hammett<br>[[Anita Loos]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Max Wagner may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:21, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Borderline (1950 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[File:Borderline (1950 1.jpg|thumb|right|[[Roy Roberts]], [[Claire Trevor]] and [[Fred MacMurray]] in ''Borderline'']]
• {{1950s-drama-film-stub}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Shopworn Angel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [Category:Films based on short fiction]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:22, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Laura (1944 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [Category:Detective films]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:52, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Flight Command may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• forced to ditch his Hellcat plane in heavy fog and mistaking Squadron Commander Billy Gary's, (his Commanding Officer ([[Walter Pidgeon]]) wife ([[Ruth Hussey]]) for a possible date.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to When Ladies Meet (1941 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | producer = Robert Z. Leonard<br>[[Orville O. Dull]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:47, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shane (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | based on = {{based on|''[[Shane (novel)|Shane]]''<br>1949 novel|[[Jack Schaefer]]]}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mary Maguire may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
= Robert Gordon-Canning (1940-1944) (divorced) (1 child)<br>Philip Henry Legarra (1945-1971) (his death} }} gov.au/Record/1969590] National Library of Australia scrapbook compiled about Mary Maguire (senior)]</ref> Nicknamed "Peggy" by the family, she was the second of five sisters. She grew up in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ann Carver's Profession may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Lawyer Ann Carver Graham ([[Fay Wray]]) success has emasculated her husband William ([[Gene Raymond]], a rather average architect. When he can't get his career jump-started, he quits

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to State's Attorney (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | writer = Louis Stevens story)<br>[[Gene Fowler]] (script)<br>Rowland Brown (script)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I removed your edit to the birth date on Rebel Wilson per discussion on article talk page. There is no consensus among the editors on the talk page on this issue. Thank you for understanding, and if you have a good reference that is acceptable to the other concerned editors there, then maybe we could put this issue to rest. I look forward to discussing this on Talk:Rebel Wilson. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 14:38, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Brief Encounter may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• The film takes place around the end of 1938. Laura Jesson ([Celia Johnson]]), a respectable middle-class woman in an affectionate but rather dull marriage, tells her story in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:14, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Picnic (1955 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Hal Carter [[William Holden]]) is a former college football star, adrift and unemployed after army service and a failed Hollywood

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:03, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to BUtterfield 8 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• that he has left her $250. Insulted, Gloria, whose dress is torn, takes Liggett's wife Emily's ([[Dina Merrill]][[mink]] coat to cover herself and scrawls "No Sale" in lipstick on the mirror. But

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Weird Science (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• a fictitious suburb of [[Chicago, Illinois|Chicago]]. There, nerdy social outcasts Gary Wallace ([[Anthony Michael Hall]) and Wyatt Donelly ([[Ilan Mitchell-Smith]]) are publicly humiliated by Ian (

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:52, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Adventures of Robin Hood may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• went into production and was released several months earlier then The Adventures of Robin Hood. [[Alan Hale, Sr.] played Little John in the ''[[Robin Hood (1922 film)|1922 version]]'' of the film

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! While I understand your good faith edits, stub tags should only be added to articles that are assessed as Stub-Class on their talk pages. Sometimes an article is on the fine line between Stub-Class and Start-Class, and if a stub tag is necessary, please consider also updating the classification on the talk page. Otherwise, please read WP:STUB for more information, and do not add stub tags to articles that are clearly not stubs. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Savolya,
I was reverting an edit in the infobox for this actor that posted a name for his child who wasn't identified in the article. That got me curious about the information about his spouse, as Wallace Thompson isn't mentioned in the article either. I found that you added the information with this edit and I was wondering if you had a source for adding this detail. Looking through the edit history, there also have been arguments that "spouse" is not the correct word to describe a longterm, same sex relationship before marriage became legal. Thanks for any help you can offer...I realize this edit was quite a few years ago. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Savolya. I reverted your last edit to Gary Cooper because your cited source does not indicate "colon cancer" as the "cause of death". According to three reliable sources—none of which provide a specific "cause of death"—he had multiple forms of cancer during his last year, including cancer of the pancreas, colon, bones, lungs, bones, etc. I have an unpublished and unverified photo purported to be of his death certificate which indicates "Carcinoma of colon" (colon cancer), which may or may not be authentic. Until someone can find a reliable source indicating that the official "cause of death" was colon cancer, we should not venture into original research. Whenever there is this type of ambiguity on a fact, it is best to choose the level of specificity supported by reliable sources—in this case, "cancer". Bede735 (talk) 14:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey great job! Thanks. Quis separabit? 13:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to As Good as It Gets may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ]). Unable to adjust to another waitress, Melvin arranges through his publisher (Linda Gehringer) (whose husband is a doctor ([[Lawrence Kasdan]]) to pay for her son's medical expenses as long as

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mmyers1976. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sleuth (1972 film) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mmyers1976 (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jackie Earle Haley may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | children = Chris Haley (b. 1986)<br>Olivia Haley (b. 1998}
• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Touch of Evil may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• In a Mexican town along the [[U.S.-Mexico border]], a time bomb is planted in a car. Rudy Linneka (Jeffrey Green} and woman Zita enter the vehicle and make a slow journey through town to the U.S. border, the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to One Man's Journey has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Like all other content you add to this wiki, plot descriptions must be written in your own words, not copied from elsewhere online. — Diannaa (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Nevada Smith has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. [1] --Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you were adding the names of article-subjects' children to infoboxes. Per Template:Infobox person names of children are supposed to be added to Infoboxes "Only if independently notable themselves or particularly relevant. Number of children (e.g., three or 3), or list of names if notable,..." Also, some of the names you've added appears to be unsourced? Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 15:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Quis separabit? 00:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Hello S. I am wondering if you have a source for this. I read through the article and couldn't find a mention of his retirement. If you do you know of a reference you might, when you have the time, add a brief mention about it to the article. I am going to miss that rich deep voice performing new characters. Fortunately, I have a number of TV series and films that he was in on DVD. Thank for your time and I hope that you have a pleasant week. MarnetteD|Talk 00:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying. Per WP:RS/IMDB that site cannot be used as a ref. Another problem is that they only list TV and film roles. Most UK based actors have a career onstage before they act in front of a camera. Next the 2014 date is only the last time he was seen onscreen. Again he might have had a stage role and he might have a new film or TV role in the future. If you come on any info from a reliable source please feel free to add it. I do appreciate your trying. MarnetteD|Talk 05:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Robin Crusoe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Robin Crusoe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gab4gab (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Natasha Lytess has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most sources are linked with Marilyn Monroe; fails WP:GNGACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jd02022092 (talk) 17:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Savolya. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Coming Home for Christmas (2017 film), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA (talk) 11:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Savolya . I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source for biographical information in Eloise Broady DeJoria. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 16:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Valley of the Sun (film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been told before that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Christmas on Honeysuckle Lane. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy Christmas!
		Hello Savolya, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that Nobody could have had a noisier Christmas Eve. And when the firemen turned off the hose and were standing in the wet, smoky room, Jim's Aunt, Miss. Prothero, came downstairs and peered in at them. Jim and I waited, very quietly, to hear what she would say to them. She said the right thing, always. She looked at the three tall firemen in their shining helmets, standing among the smoke and cinders and dissolving snowballs, and she said, "Would you like anything to read?" My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 20:58, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Christmas on Honeysuckle Lane.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for developing the new article on "Christmas on Honeysuckle Lane", though I highly recommend adding some professional reviews and commentary if there is any.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:45, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I refer to your addition of a cast section to the article Tank Girl (film). Please be advised as per MOS:FILM, film articles on Wikipedia do not necessarily have to have cast sections. At the featured article nomination for Tank Girl it was agreed that the cast section would be merged with the plot. I encourage you to keep editing Wikipedia, however, in the future it's a good idea to use caution when adding an entire new section of data to a featured article, and perhaps check the article's history and talk pages first. Featured articles have all been extensively peer reviewed so if something looks like it is missing, that is likely for a good reason. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The War of the Worlds (1953 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please see WP:CIRCULAR; Wikipedia links should not be used as references. DonIago (talk) 15:35, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kristin Bauer van Straten, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources. and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please see WP:LP and the article’s talk:Kristin Bauer van Straten page. Dusty|💬|You can help! 21:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Melanie Smith (actress), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 16:26, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kenneth Welsh, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The IMDb is user-generated and thus not a reliable source. Please do not cite it as source on Wikipedia or copy its data here. Also, please don't add embedded external links to the article body; this is disallowed by WP:EL. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Savolya (talk)understood

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christmas List (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas List (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 12:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coming Home for Christmas (2017 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coming Home for Christmas (2017 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 13:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Crown for Christmas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable television film, no significant coverage from independent sources, per WP:NF and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 23:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Mistletoe Inn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable television film, did not receive significant coverage by independent sources, per WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 02:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BOVINEBOY2008 13:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BOVINEBOY2008 10:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Backyard Wedding has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable television film, does not meet WP:NF or WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage by independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 01:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BOVINEBOY2008 22:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BOVINEBOY2008 00:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

you added yearsactive = 2005-present to the {{Infobox person}} for Sébastien Foucan earlier this year ([2]). That is at odds with the lede and body of the article, which mentions TV appearances in 2003. And based on Parkour § Name and split, he was active and at least somewhat notable as early as 1997. Could you take another look and fix the contradiction as you think appropriate?

Cheers,

- 2A02:560:424B:4100:7D7C:6346:69CD:DC39 (talk) 19:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the color process field of the film infobox template is only to be used for animated films, per the documentation for the infobox. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 13:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info Savolya (talk) 15:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the above article, you pasted four paragraphs from this copyright web page. That's a violation of our copyright policy. The only reason you are not blocked right now is because it's been four years since I gave you a final warning. Please don't copy material from elsewhere online! This is your last chance. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 14:06, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Was just too enthusiastic about the news. Thanks for the warning. Savolya (talk) 14:09, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re-did the Mátészalka reference Savolya (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've done some copy edit and added wikilinks etc. — Diannaa (talk) 20:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very well done, thanks for the lesson Savolya (talk) 12:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on adding infoboxes! I just wanted to let you know that for Template:Infobox television, there are a number of parameters that have been made obsolete. On your recent edit to The Spiral Staircase (1961 film), this included show_name, show_name_2, format, status, website, website_title, and production_website, all of which are now obsolete. I'm assuming you're copy/pasting from somewhere, so you might want to update whatever that is so that you don't paste in obsolete parameters, otherwise the article ends up in Category:Pages using infobox television with unknown parameters for maintenance. ButlerBlog (talk) 14:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update Savolya (talk) 11:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to The Thing from Another World have been removed because you cited the information you added to IMDb. As discussed at WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is considered a questionable source, and generally should not be used as a sole reference. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reliable source, or with an additional source confirming the information from IMDb. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I added TCM & AFI as references. Savolya (talk) 00:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! DonIago (talk) 04:13, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Magnificent Ambersons (film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please note that the Narrator param should only be used for documentaries, as explicitly stated at Template:Infobox film. DonIago (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect A Snow Globe Christmas has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 14 § A Snow Globe Christmas until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Hipal (talk) 23:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Karolina Protsenko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karolina Protsenko. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 14:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again: 1. please don't add incorrect/deprecated code <br> instead of {{ubl}} to infobox template 2. your add to the infobox template (which you now corrected regarding year of release) is already included in the article's intro section 3. the "based on" template parameter is clearly for the work's title and the author's name, see Template:Infobox film. Please stop making edits which could be regarded Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Robert Kerber (talk) 19:49, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point

Thanks Savolya (talk) 20:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits on Katrina Law's DOB because none of those are reliable sources. As per WP:BLPPRIVACY there are only a couple acceptable options when it comes to WP:DOB. A truly reliable Secondary source(IE a magazine such as Los Angeles Times or New York Times. And preferably multiple of these) reporting their exact DOB. Or a social media post from the subject themselves where he or she confirms his or her birthday and preferably either his or her age or YOB in the same post as well. Failing either one of those, they should be kept out of the article for now.

And I'd also like to point out that she graduated from Stockton University in 1999. This was cited in the article[3] So the 1985 birth year that a lot of sites have listed is very likely to be incorrect and just web scraped that from other sites. Unless she happens to be some sort of child prodigy, it's very unlikely she was just 13 when she graduated from college. Kcj5062 (talk) 00:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just wanted to offer you a friendly notice that Rotten Tomatoes cannot be used to source a WP:BLP with date of birth, etc. See the recent RFC here. Thank you. Mike Allen 18:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see that you added a section for the plot on films that don't have one, however you are using "Expand Section"

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (December 2023)

when adding the section. This should only be used when the plot is already present, but is not sufficient. Going forward, it is more accurate to use "noplot"

This article needs a plot summary. Please add one in your own words. (December 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

when adding a section for Plot that does not already exist.

Thank you for your help in making Wikipedia articles better. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will do Savolya (talk) 14:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Maila Nurmi has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Death Curse of Tartu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 15:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Philip Michael Thomas. Thank you. Οἶδα (talk) 04:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Philip Michael Thomas. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Οἶδα (talk) 17:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, in the section;

==Personal life==

Thomas is a vegetarian, nonsmoker, and nondrinker.^[1][2] In 1986, he was sued for child support by Dhaima Mathews, the mother of his then 2-year-old daughter and 9-week-old son.^[3] Thomas later married model Kassandra Green. Green filed a domestic violence complaint against Thomas in 1997, during which time she was described as being the mother of 5 of his 12 children. Thomas dismissed the complaint as "an absolute, blatant lie".^[4][5]

Do you accept that he was married etc?? Savolya (talk) 17:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't accept that they married in 1986, because that is an unsourced claim you added. You can add her to the infobox if you want without a year of marriage. But it seems that they are divorced, a claim which I cannot substantiate with a verifiable source and hence have not added it. So without a year of marriage or divorce I believe it will give the impression that they remain married. That is why I removed not only the year of marriage but the marriage entry altogether from the infobox. Οἶδα (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK Savolya (talk) 18:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Erwin Kalser has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 16:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Jenna Haze has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only added years active;

| yearsactive = 2001-2019 Savolya (talk) 19:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter; the edit summary is for telling other users and readers what you did. Explaining your edits is required by policy. Even a blank edit summary is preferable to a false or misleading one. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, regarding this edit, where did you find this very old copy of the infobox? Some of the parameters you've added haven't been available for years. Gonnym (talk) 10:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to The Sheriff (1971 film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and . as you are a very experienced editor I would expect you to include more than one reference when creating an article. The article is of high quality, but does not appear to meet WP:NFILM.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You people seem to be racially prejudice. There are external references etc. More than some accepted movies Savolya (talk) 16:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You people seem to be racially prejudice. There are external references etc. Savolya (talk) 12:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have a question about your edit to the Richard Lyford article; What does the link to "Bo' Selecta!" Episode#2.4 have to do with Richard Lyford? I couldn't find any reference to him in that link. ArthurRead1976 (talk) 14:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0528032/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

contains info on

Richard Lyford(1917-1985) Savolya (talk) 15:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prairie Fever, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prairie Fever until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WHY DELETE THIS FILM WHEN WIKIPEDIA HAS THOUSANDS OF FILMS FROM 10 minutes to 30 minutes long with less notable actors? Savolya (talk) 01:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Οἶδα. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Between Two Worlds (2021 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Οἶδα (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Savolya. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Death Curse of Tartu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]