User talk:ReadOnlyAccount

Cp37, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

dxneo (talk) 05:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elephants all the way down and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ReadOnlyAccount! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ReadOnlyAccount. I saw you've repeatedly edited your post on Talk:List of numeral systems. Per WP:TALK#REPLIED you should not edit your own comment after it's been replied to. Also, consider the second bullet of WP:TOPPOST, Avoid excessive use of color and other font gimmicks. I think the highlighting you did could be justified (if I knew what your intent was), but it's something to keep in mind in the future. In general, WP:TALK lists all the relevant guidelines.

What are you trying to do with your edits at that talk page? I know Wikipedia's guidelines are both legion and opaque at first, so perhaps if you explain what your goal is, I can help point you in the direction to better accomplish it. EducatedRedneck (talk) 21:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above relates to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReadOnlyAccount (talk • contribs)

ReadOnlyAccount, I strongly encourage you to read the above linked guidelines. As a courtesy, I thought I should try to inform you of how talk pages are handled here, rather than at the article, but here you failed to sign a comment, and you then continued to modify your comment after it'd been replied to. EducatedRedneck (talk) 22:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article RAM card has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Could not find any reliable sources anywhere on the internet, it is probably not notable enough. Please look at WP:NRV for more information. I also think RAM cards are interchangeable from RAM drives, but please correct me if I am wrong.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Keres🌕Luna ^edits! 21:58, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for thanking me! (Thankception? Lol)

Положение my page right there 01:03, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ReadOnlyAccount, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, RAM card, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RAM card.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Multifunction card. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if I should feel bad because it's on me that the sources were kind of hidden (because of reasons), or if you should feel bad because you've really not looked closely before pulling the trigger. That said, I'm really not going to argue any more of this today. I think I've said my piece in relevant places, maybe in several wrong places like Larry Laffer, but I contend that smart people who care have all the information they need to make wise decisions. –ReadOnlyAccount (talk) 04:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ReadOnlyAccount-- Multifunction card has been moved to draftspace, where you can continue to work on it. This can help save it from being placed for deletion until it is ready for the main space. Many articles exist on Wikipedia about technology that existed prior to the internet as people certainly learned new information before the "WWW" (see IBM 7030 Stretch, for example). If a topic is notable according to Wikipedia's guidelines, it should be discussed in books, magazines, journal articles, etc. You can use those sources to prove your subjects are indeed notable. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. When replying to someone, it's helpful to ping them so they know you have responded. You can ping by writing @[[User:Significa liberdade|Significa liberdade]] (as an example). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ReadOnlyAccount,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Multi-I/O card for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Multi-I/O card to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ReadOnlyAccount,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Multi-function card for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Multi-function card to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I again apologize for improperly using the PROD function, thank you for pointing it out, like it says on my User Page 'please tell me if I am doing something wrong'! However, Wikipedia needs citations for its articles, according to WP:OR, so if an article doesn't have reliable references, it will probably be deleted. Thank you for your understanding. Keres🌕Luna ^edits! 04:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies accepted. Thank you. –ReadOnlyAccount (talk) 04:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Social media forum has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 4 § Social media forum until a consensus is reached.

Also listed under the same nomination is Social bookmarking forum. (Leaving this message as I’ve just seen you weren’t notified when these were nominated.)

Best, ^user:A smart kitten_meow 06:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based on you aversion to information loss expressed in your essay, Wikipedia:Redirects to nowhere, you may be interested in helping identify controversial or inappropriate deletion proposals. ~Kvng (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not having paid proper and timely attention to the link in the headline. My editing is a bit erratic, maybe mood-driven, I feel. It's not that I don't want to look, but no promises. Thanks for the hint either way. —ReadOnlyAccount (talk) 20:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

People like you make the newcomers have more confidence in wikipedia's community!

Hym3242 (talk) 12:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kindness. Fingers crossed I won't un-earn this by being more abrasive again soon – as I'm conscious I've arguably sometimes been. I think the kitten is working as positive reinforcement though. So Pavlovian. Much conditioning. Very behaviourism. Wow. —ReadOnlyAccount (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ReadOnlyAccount. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elephants all the way down, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ReadOnlyAccount

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Викидим and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Telegraph wire, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5 § Telegraph wire.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Викидим}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Викидим (talk) 21:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm perplexed by your reverts. Leaving a paragraph without a signature following it is just not part of how talk pages are used. "Attributing unsigned comments" and "Signature cleanup" are among the things permitted by the talk page guidelines to edit others' comments to do. If it weren't for "PS:", your small text would be indistinguishable from an unsigned comment. And this is what happens when someone replies to your comment using the reply tool. What do you want out of leaving the text unattributed so badly you spend dozens of words in summaries? What are you trying to accomplish here? Nardog (talk) 15:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ReadOnlyAccount. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Multifunction card, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ReadOnlyAccount. Thank you for your work on Aurora Rising. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 05:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts: I didn't add a category this time, because I wasn't sure what category was applicable. Thankfully —well, it's a mixed blessing at times, but here definitely thankfully— I'm not alone here, and I see you've added something, for which, thanks. :) —ReadOnlyAccount (talk) 13:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]